HolyStudy
Bible IndexRead BibleNotesChurchesMissionPrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurchesSign in
HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurches
Sign in

Matthew 15

1

Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,

2

Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.

1
3

But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?

4

For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.

1
5

But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;

6

And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.

7

Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,

8

This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.

1
9

But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

10

And he called the multitude, and said unto them, Hear, and understand:

11

Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.

12

Then came his disciples, and said unto him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended, after they heard this saying?

1
13

But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.

14

Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

15

Then answered Peter and said unto him, Declare unto us this parable.

1
16

And Jesus said, Are ye also yet without understanding?

17

Do not ye yet understand, that whatsoever entereth in at the mouth goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the draught?

18

But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.

1
19

For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:

20

These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man.

21

Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon.

1
22

And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.

23

But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.

24

But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

25

Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.

26

But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs.

27

And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters’ table.

28

Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.

29

And Jesus departed from thence, and came nigh unto the sea of Galilee; and went up into a mountain, and sat down there.

30

And great multitudes came unto him, having with them those that were lame, blind, dumb, maimed, and many others, and cast them down at Jesus’ feet; and he healed them:

31

Insomuch that the multitude wondered, when they saw the dumb to speak, the maimed to be whole, the lame to walk, and the blind to see: and they glorified the God of Israel.

32

Then Jesus called his disciples unto him, and said, I have compassion on the multitude, because they continue with me now three days, and have nothing to eat: and I will not send them away fasting, lest they faint in the way.

33

And his disciples say unto him, Whence should we have so much bread in the wilderness, as to fill so great a multitude?

34

And Jesus saith unto them, How many loaves have ye? And they said, Seven, and a few little fishes.

35

And he commanded the multitude to sit down on the ground.

36

And he took the seven loaves and the fishes, and gave thanks, and brake them, and gave to his disciples, and the disciples to the multitude.

37

And they did all eat, and were filled: and they took up of the broken meat that was left seven baskets full.

38

And they that did eat were four thousand men, beside women and children.

39

And he sent away the multitude, and took ship, and came into the coasts of Magdala.

← Previous ChapterNext Chapter →

Matthew 15

The defilement controversy opens with the Pharisees' challenge about the tradition of handwashing, which Jesus reframes entirely: what defiles a person is not what enters the mouth but what comes out of it — the heart's production of evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, and slander. The tradition of the elders, which had allowed children to declare money Corban (dedicated to God) rather than use it to support aging parents, is exposed as a way of nullifying the commandment to honor father and mother. The Canaanite woman episode is Matthew's most theologically charged encounter: a Gentile woman with a demonized daughter persists through apparent dismissal (I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel; it is not right to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs) with the brilliant reply: even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from the master's table. Jesus declares her faith great and heals her daughter immediately. A second feeding (four thousand, seven loaves, seven basketfuls of leftovers) closes the chapter.

Matthew 15:27

She said: yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters' table. The woman's response is the most brilliant answer in the Gospels: she accepts the children-and-dogs metaphor without protest and finds within it the basis for her request. Yes, Lord — she concedes the point — yet even the dogs eat the crumbs from the table. The crumbs that fall from the children's meal are sufficient for the dogs, and the crumbs of Jesus' healing power are enough for her daughter. The woman is not claiming equality with the children; she is claiming that the overflow of the children's portion is enough for her need.

Matthew 15:28

Then Jesus answered her: O woman, great is your faith! Be it done for you as you desire. And her daughter was healed instantly. The commendation of great faith — the same superlative applied to no Jewish person in Matthew's Gospel, though it is used for the centurion in Matthew 8:10 — is the climax of the encounter. The healing from that moment communicates the instant fulfillment of the faith-driven request. The Canaanite woman who was outside the mission's stated scope received the greatest commendation of faith in the Gospel.

Matthew 15:29

Jesus went on from there and walked beside the Sea of Galilee. And he went up on the mountain and sat down there. The return to the Sea of Galilee and the mountain — the same setting as the Sermon on the Mount — suggests the teaching posture of the rabbi. The sitting down communicates that Jesus is settling in for a sustained ministry of healing and teaching.

Matthew 15:30

And great crowds came to him, bringing with them the lame, the blind, the crippled, the mute, and many others, and they put them at his feet, and he healed them. The comprehensive healing catalog — lame, blind, crippled, mute — in the context of the Decapolis (the Gentile region east of the Jordan, based on Mark 7:31) communicates the universal scope of Jesus' healing ministry. The many others that complete the list cover the full range of human suffering that the healing crowd represents.

Matthew 15:31

So that the crowd marveled, when they saw the mute speaking, the crippled healthy, the lame walking, and the blind seeing. And they glorified the God of Israel. The crowd's glorifying of the God of Israel — unusual phrasing that implies the crowd may include Gentiles who recognize the Jewish God's activity through Jesus — communicates the universal dimension of the healing ministry. The God of Israel is being revealed through the healings to a crowd that includes those outside Israel's covenant.

Matthew 15:32

Then Jesus called his disciples to him and said: I have compassion on the crowd because they have been with me now three days and have nothing to eat. And I am unwilling to send them away hungry, lest they faint on the way. The second feeding miracle (the feeding of the four thousand) begins with Jesus' own compassion-initiative rather than the disciples' practical concern. The three days communicates a sustained ministry: the crowd has been present for three days without food. The unwillingness to send them away hungry is the same compassion that drove the feeding of the five thousand.

Matthew 15:33

And the disciples said to him: where are we to get enough bread in such a desolate place to feed so great a crowd? The disciples' question — where are we to get enough bread — reveals that the lesson of the feeding of the five thousand has not fully transferred: they are again surprised by the crowd's need and their own inadequacy. The disciples who participated in the five-thousand feeding have not yet generalized from that experience to this one.

Matthew 15:34

And Jesus said to them: how many loaves do you have? They said: seven, and a few small fish. The inventory for the second feeding: seven loaves and a few small fish, compared to five loaves and two fish in the first feeding. The different numbers communicate that this is a separate event, not a literary doublet of the same story. Both feedings share the same four-fold eucharistic action (took, gave thanks, broke, gave) but the numbers and settings differ.

Matthew 15:35

And directing the crowd to sit down on the ground. Jesus commands the crowd to sit on the ground — the same sitting on the ground as the five-thousand feeding (though that crowd sat on the grass). The command communicates the order and intentionality of the feeding: this is not an unstructured distribution but an organized meal.

Matthew 15:36

He took the seven loaves and the fish, and having given thanks he broke them and gave them to the disciples, and the disciples gave them to the crowds. The four eucharistic actions in the four-thousand feeding: took, gave thanks, broke, gave. The disciples who distribute the broken bread and fish are the mediators of the divine provision — the same role as in the five-thousand feeding. The community of disciples is the channel through which the kingdom's abundance reaches the crowd.

Matthew 15:37

And they all ate and were satisfied. And they took up seven baskets full of the broken pieces left over. The satisfaction of the four thousand and the seven baskets of leftovers communicate the same super-abundance as the five-thousand feeding. The seven baskets parallel the seven loaves: the leftovers equal the initial provision. The number seven communicates completion and fullness.

Matthew 15:38

Those who ate were four thousand men, besides women and children. The four-thousand count alongside the women and children follows the same counting convention as the five-thousand feeding: men counted, women and children additional. The total crowd was significantly larger than four thousand.

Matthew 15:39

And after sending away the crowds, he got into the boat and went to the region of Magadan. The dispersal and departure by boat to Magadan (or Magdala, on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee) completes the chapter's movement from the Galilean controversy (Pharisees and scribes from Jerusalem) through the Phoenician territory (Canaanite woman) to the Decapolis region (four-thousand feeding) and back across the lake. The chapter communicates the geographical expansion of the kingdom's ministry alongside the deepening of its theological content.

Matthew 15:12

Then the disciples came and said to him: do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying? The disciples' concern about the Pharisees' offense is the concern of those who still see the Pharisees' approval as relevant. The were offended is the same root as the stumbling-block language of Matthew 11:6 and 13:57: the Pharisees stumbled over what Jesus taught.

Matthew 15:13

He answered: every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be rooted up. The plant metaphor for the Pharisees' tradition: every teaching (plant) that does not have the Father as its source will be uprooted. The agricultural imagery mirrors the parable of the weeds (Matthew 13:24–30): the plants that are not the Father's planting will be removed at the harvest.

Matthew 15:14

Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit. The blind guides — the Pharisees who cannot see the distinction between the commandment of God and the tradition of men — will lead those who follow them into the same blindness. The pit that both the guide and the guided fall into is the eschatological judgment that follows from the heart's distance from God (verse 8).

Matthew 15:15

But Peter said to him: explain the parable to us. Peter's request for an explanation — explain the parable to us — is the same pattern as the disciples' request for the weeds parable's explanation in Matthew 13:36. The parable in this context is the teaching of verse 11: the in-mouth-out-of-mouth principle that the disciples have not yet fully understood.

Matthew 15:16

And he said: are you also still without understanding? The gentle rebuke — are you also still without understanding — communicates the patient frustration of the teacher whose students have not yet grasped the principle. The still communicates a timeline: by this point in the ministry, the disciples should understand the principle that heart-condition precedes ritual-condition.

Matthew 15:19

For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander. The catalog of evil things that proceed from the heart — evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander — is the list of moral defilements that the heart produces. The list echoes the Decalogue's second table: the commandments addressing human relationships are the commandments that the evil heart violates. The Sermon on the Mount's teaching about the heart behind the command is the context for this catalog.

Matthew 15:17

Do you not see that whatever goes into the mouth passes into the stomach and is expelled? The physiological explanation: food enters the body, is processed, and is eliminated. The digestive process does not affect the heart — the moral center of the person. The physical process of eating bypasses the moral dimension of the person's life entirely.

Matthew 15:21

And Jesus went away from there and withdrew to the district of Tyre and Sidon. The withdrawal to the Gentile territory of Tyre and Sidon — north of Galilee on the Phoenician coast — is the geographical frame for the Canaanite woman encounter. The same cities that Matthew 11:21 used as the example of pagans who would have repented if they had seen Jesus' miracles are now the setting for a Gentile who demonstrates extraordinary faith.

Matthew 15:22

And behold, a Canaanite woman from that region came out and was crying: have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of David; my daughter is severely oppressed by a demon. The Canaanite woman's cry combines the covenant title Son of David with the petition for mercy. The use of Son of David by a Gentile woman is the most striking feature of her initial cry: she addresses Jesus with the distinctively Jewish messianic title. The daughter severely oppressed by a demon is the specific need that her faith-cry presents.

Matthew 15:23

But he did not answer her a word. And his disciples came and begged him, saying: send her away, for she is crying out after us. Jesus' silence — not an answer, not a refusal, just silence — is the most troubling element of the encounter. The disciples' request to send her away is the pragmatic response to an irritating situation: she is crying out after us. The disciples want to resolve the discomfort by dismissal.

Matthew 15:24

He answered: I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Jesus' first verbal response to the woman addresses the disciples rather than directly answering her: his mission is to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. The limitation is real — the Galilean ministry is the primary focus of the earthly mission — but the story is far from over. The boundary statement is not the final word; it is the context within which the woman's extraordinary faith will be displayed.

Matthew 15:25

But she came and knelt before him, saying: Lord, help me. The woman's response to the boundary statement: she comes and kneels, reducing the petition to its absolute minimum: Lord, help me. The kneeling communicates the posture of worship and desperate dependence; the help me strips the request of all elaboration. The woman who has been told she is outside the mission's scope does not argue — she kneels.

Matthew 15:26

And he answered: it is not right to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs. Jesus' second response uses the children-and-dogs metaphor: the bread intended for the children of Israel is not to be thrown to the dogs. The dogs in the ancient Jewish idiom for Gentiles was a term of contempt; Jesus uses the diminutive (little dogs, household pets) which softens the contrast. The statement presents the woman with the full force of the ethnic boundary she is crossing.

Matthew 15:20

These are what defile a person. But to eat with unwashed hands does not defile anyone. The conclusion: the catalog of heart-sourced sins is what defiles; eating with unwashed hands does not. The Pharisees' concern about handwashing addressed the wrong category of defilement. The washing that matters is the washing of the heart — the circumcision of the heart that Deuteronomy 30:6 promised and Jeremiah 31:33 elaborated.

Matthew 15:18

But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a person. The heart is the source of what exits the mouth: the speech that comes out of the mouth has the heart as its origin, and it is the heart's condition that makes the speech defiling. The defiling speech is the evidence of the defiling heart; addressing the speech without addressing the heart is the Pharisaic error.

Matthew 15:1

Then Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem and said. The delegation of Pharisees and scribes from Jerusalem — the religious capital — represents a formal official challenge rather than a local Galilean dispute. The journey from Jerusalem communicates the seriousness with which the religious establishment views the threat that Jesus represents. The question they bring is about ritual handwashing — a tradition of the elders, not a biblical command.

Matthew 15:2

Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat. The handwashing accusation targets the disciples' failure to observe the oral tradition's pre-meal purification rituals. The tradition of the elders is the scribal elaboration of the Torah — the fence around the law that the Pharisees developed to prevent inadvertent Torah violations. The washing was not a Mosaic command but a rabbinic addition.

Matthew 15:3

He answered them: and why do you break the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? Jesus' counter-challenge: the Pharisees who accuse the disciples of breaking the tradition of the elders are themselves breaking the commandment of God through their tradition. The escalation from tradition-of-elders to commandment-of-God communicates the difference in authority between the two: the biblical command and the scribal tradition are not equivalent, and when they conflict, the biblical command must take priority.

Matthew 15:4

For God commanded, honor your father and your mother, and whoever reviles father or mother must surely die. The biblical command that the Pharisees' tradition contradicts: honor your father and your mother (Exodus 20:12) with the associated death penalty for cursing parents (Exodus 21:17). The command to honor parents is the Fifth Commandment — one of the most fundamental ethical commands of the covenant community.

Matthew 15:5

But you say: if anyone tells his father or his mother, what you would have gained from me is given to God, he need not honor his father. The corban practice (Mark 7:11 names it explicitly): the Pharisaic ruling that allowed a person to declare their resources corban (dedicated to God) and thereby excuse themselves from the obligation to support their parents financially. The dedication to God created a technical religious obligation that overrode the familial obligation.

Matthew 15:6

So for the sake of your tradition you have made void the word of God. The charge: the Pharisees have nullified the word of God through their tradition. The tradition that was designed to protect the law has become the instrument by which the law is violated. The very mechanism created to honor God is used to dishonor parents — and God's command says both are required.

Matthew 15:7

You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said. The hypocrite accusation and the fulfillment citation from Isaiah 29:13 are the climax of Jesus' response to the Jerusalem delegation. The Isaiah quotation identifies the Pharisees' practice as the fulfillment of the prophetic charge against Israel: worship with lips while the heart is far from God.

Matthew 15:8

This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. The Isaiah 29:13 quotation applied to the Pharisees: the lip-service worship that the prophet identified in Israel's generations is the same worship the Pharisees offer. The tradition of handwashing that they enforce publicly while violating the Fifth Commandment through the corban practice is precisely the honoring-with-lips-while-the-heart-is-far pattern.

Matthew 15:9

In vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men. The worship that is in vain — the ritual observance that does not correspond to the heart's alignment with God's purposes — is the worship that the Pharisees' tradition-teaching produces. Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men is what the tradition-over-commandment practice amounts to: human additions treated as divine requirements.

Matthew 15:10

And he called the people to him and said to them: hear and understand. The public teaching that follows the private confrontation with the Jerusalem delegation: Jesus calls the crowd to hear and understand — the same ears-to-hear summons as in the Parable Discourse. What follows is the teaching on true defilement that directly contradicts the Pharisaic tradition of ritual purity.

Matthew 15:11

It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person. The principle that overturns the ritual purity framework: what enters the mouth (food) does not defile; what exits the mouth (speech from the heart) does defile. The principle is not the abolition of the dietary laws in their immediate application but the identification of moral impurity (from the heart) as more fundamentally defiling than ritual impurity (from food contact).