HolyStudy
Bible IndexRead BibleNotesChurchesMissionPrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurchesSign in
HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurches
Sign in

Numbers 36

1

And the chief fathers of the families of the children of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of the sons of Joseph, came near, and spake before Moses, and before the princes, the chief fathers of the children of Israel:

2

And they said, The Lord commanded my lord to give the land for an inheritance by lot to the children of Israel: and my lord was commanded by the Lord to give the inheritance of Zelophehad our brother unto his daughters.

3

And if they be married to any of the sons of the other tribes of the children of Israel, then shall their inheritance be taken from the inheritance of our fathers, and shall be put to the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received: so shall it be taken from the lot of our inheritance.

1
4

And when the jubile of the children of Israel shall be, then shall their inheritance be put unto the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are received: so shall their inheritance be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers.

5

And Moses commanded the children of Israel according to the word of the Lord, saying, The tribe of the sons of Joseph hath said well.

6

This is the thing which the Lord doth command concerning the daughters of Zelophehad, saying, Let them marry to whom they think best; only to the family of the tribe of their father shall they marry.

7

So shall not the inheritance of the children of Israel remove from tribe to tribe: for every one of the children of Israel shall keep himself to the inheritance of the tribe of his fathers.

8

And every daughter, that possesseth an inheritance in any tribe of the children of Israel, shall be wife unto one of the family of the tribe of her father, that the children of Israel may enjoy every man the inheritance of his fathers.

9

Neither shall the inheritance remove from one tribe to another tribe; but every one of the tribes of the children of Israel shall keep himself to his own inheritance.

10

Even as the Lord commanded Moses, so did the daughters of Zelophehad:

11

For Mahlah, Tirzah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Noah, the daughters of Zelophehad, were married unto their father’s brothers’ sons:

12

And they were married into the families of the sons of Manasseh the son of Joseph, and their inheritance remained in the tribe of the family of their father.

13

These are the commandments and the judgments, which the Lord commanded by the hand of Moses unto the children of Israel in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho.

← Previous ChapterNext Chapter →

Numbers 36

The daughters of Zelophehad are required to marry within their father's tribe (Manasseh) to prevent tribal land from transferring to another tribe through marriage, a legal resolution that preserves tribal land boundaries while affirming women's inheritance rights: the daughters 'must marry someone from within the clan of their father's tribe' to prevent land fragmentation. The daughters' selection of cousins (all four marriages unite them with Manassites) establishes that land preservation takes priority over marriage freedom, yet their agency in choosing their cousins (unlike earlier marriages where matches were arranged by others) suggests a negotiated balance between family property interests and individual choice. The law's universal application—'All of Zelophehad's daughters did just as the Lord commanded Moses'—affirms that this specific case (women inheriting from fathers) requires institutional structure to prevent economic disruption, making Numbers 36 a legal precedent with broader implications. The conclusion—'These were the commands and regulations the Lord gave through Moses to the Israelites on the plains of Moab by the Jordan across from Jericho'—provides the book's colophon, locating all the laws from the second census onward to this moment on the threshold of Canaan, establishing that Numbers' second half (ch. 26 onward) is delivered as Israel prepares to enter the land. The daughters' designation 'within the clan of their father's tribe, so that every Israelite will possess the inheritance of his ancestors' refocuses the entire Zelophehad narrative on land preservation and tribal continuity, making Numbers 36 simultaneously a legal resolution and a theological statement about how inheritance (both property and covenant) passes through generations. Numbers 36's placement as the final chapter transforms the Zelophehad daughters from legal supplicants into exemplars of faithfulness: they inherit property, exercise agency in marriage, and preserve tribal land, modeling how women participate in covenant community even within patriarchal structures, and their story's framing as the last substantive narrative in Numbers establishes that the book's ultimate concern is land inheritance and the preservation of tribal identity as Israel enters Canaan.

Numbers 36:1

And the chief fathers of the families of the children of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of the sons of Joseph, came near, and spake before Moses, and before the princes, the chief of the fathers of the children of Israel — the Manassite patriarchs approach Moses and the leadership with a concern. They represent the families of Machir (whose clan was assigned Gilead in 32:39), and they speak on behalf of the larger Josephite lineage. Their petition suggests they have detected a potential legal problem in the inheritance system.

Numbers 36:2

And they said, The LORD commanded my lord to give the land for an inheritance by lot to the children of Israel: and my lord was commanded by the LORD to give the inheritance of Zelophehad our brother unto his daughters — the petitioners reference the case of Zelophehad (ch. 27), whose daughters inherited his property because he had no sons. The daughters received their father's inheritance by divine command. The petitioners now identify a potential conflict: if these daughters marry outside Manasseh, their inherited property may transfer to other tribes.

Numbers 36:3

And if they be married to any of the sons of the other tribes of the children of Israel, then shall their inheritance be taken from the inheritance of our fathers, and shall be put to the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are married: so shall it be taken from the lot of our inheritance — the Manassites' concern is clearly stated: if Zelophehad's daughters marry men from other tribes, the inheritance laws (whereby property transfers to a woman's husband's tribe upon marriage) would move their father's property out of Manasseh. This would reduce Manasseh's territorial inheritance and enrich other tribes. The Jubilee principle (where property returns to original owners) would not correct this, because the daughters' inheritance is permanent.

Numbers 36:4

And when the jubile of the children of Israel shall be, then shall their inheritance be put unto the inheritance of the tribe whereunto they are married: and their inheritance shall be taken away from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers — the problem is compounded at the Jubilee (when most property reverts to original owners): the daughters' inherited property would not return to Manasseh but would remain with the tribe of their husbands. This permanent loss creates a legal and economic imbalance.

Numbers 36:5

Then Moses commanded the children of Israel according to the word of the LORD, saying, The tribe of the sons of Joseph hath said well — Moses acknowledges the validity of the Manassite concern. Their argument is legally sound: the inheritance system must prevent property-fragmentation across tribal boundaries. The principle of tribal-land integrity, essential to the covenant, must be preserved.

Numbers 36:6

This is the thing which the LORD hath commanded concerning the daughters of Zelophehad, saying, Let them marry to whom they think best; only to the family of the tribe of their father shall they marry — Moses pronounces the legal solution: the daughters of Zelophehad may marry whom they choose, but only men from their father's tribe (Manasseh). This resolves the conflict: the daughters maintain agency in spouse-selection, but marriage must occur within the tribe, preserving the inheritance within Manasseh.

Numbers 36:7

So shall not the inheritance of the children of Israel remove from tribe to tribe: for every one of the children of Israel shall keep himself to the inheritance of the tribe of his fathers — the principle is stated: tribal inheritance must remain within each tribe, preventing cross-tribal property transfer. Every member is obligated to maintain tribal-property integrity for future generations. This protects the Lord's apportionment of the land: tribal boundaries, once set by divine lot, are inviolable.

Numbers 36:8

And every daughter, that possesseth an inheritance in any tribe of the children of Israel, shall be wife unto one of the family of the tribe of her father, that the children of Israel may enjoy every man the inheritance of his fathers — the law extends beyond Zelophehad's daughters to all heiress-daughters: any woman who inherits property must marry within her paternal tribe. This ensures that all tribal inheritances are preserved across generations and that the covenantal division of the land remains perpetually intact.

Numbers 36:9

Neither shall the inheritance remove from one tribe to another tribe; but every one of the tribes of the children of Israel shall keep himself to his own inheritance — the final principle: no tribe's inheritance may transfer to another. Each tribe maintains perpetual possession of its apportioned territory. This principle is foundational to Israel's covenant-theology: the land is an eternal gift, its distribution fixed by divine lot.

Numbers 36:10

Even as the LORD commanded Moses, so did the daughters of Zelophehad — the narrative confirms that Zelophehad's daughters complied with the law. They accepted the restriction on marriage choice in order to maintain family-property integrity and tribal inheritance.

Numbers 36:11

For Mahlah, Tirzah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Noah, the daughters of Zelophehad, were married unto the sons of their father's brothers — the five daughters married cousins (their father's brothers' sons), fulfilling the tribal-endogamy requirement. These marriages kept the property within the extended family and the tribe, solving the inheritance crisis while preserving family continuity.

Numbers 36:12

And they were married into the families of the sons of Manasseh the son of Joseph: and their inheritance remained in the tribe of the family of their father — the marriage of the daughters to Manassite men ensured that the inherited property remained within Manasseh. The legal crisis is resolved, and the daughters' inheritance is permanently secured within their paternal tribe.

Numbers 36:13

These are the commandments and the judgments which the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses unto the children of Israel in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho — the book of Numbers concludes with this summary statement: the laws just given are divine commandments delivered through Moses to Israel on the plains of Moab by the Jordan near Jericho. The location-formula identifies this as the final moment of the wilderness period, just before entry into Canaan. The content emphasizes that the entire legal structure—including refugee-cities, inheritance law, and tribal-land integrity—constitutes the covenant-framework for Israel's life in the promised land. The closing verse affirms the complete divine guidance from Egypt to the threshold of Canaan.