““‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at my right hand, until I put your enemies under your feet”’?”
If then David calls him Lord, how is he his son? The logical conclusion: if David calls the Christ Lord, the Christ must be more than merely David's descendant. The question points to the divine sonship that Peter confessed (Matthew 16:16) and that the Sadducees' arguments implicitly denied: the Christ is both David's son (fully human, born in David's line) and David's Lord (fully divine, worshipped by David).
Community Reflections
No reflections on this verse yet
Be the first to write a reflection about this verse.
Matthew 22:44
““‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at my right hand, until I put your enemies under your feet”’?”
If then David calls him Lord, how is he his son? The logical conclusion: if David calls the Christ Lord, the Christ must be more than merely David's descendant. The question points to the divine sonship that Peter confessed (Matthew 16:16) and that the Sadducees' arguments implicitly denied: the Christ is both David's son (fully human, born in David's line) and David's Lord (fully divine, worshipped by David).
Community Reflections
No reflections on this verse yet
Be the first to write a reflection about this verse.
If then David calls him Lord, how is he his son? The logical conclusion: if David calls the Christ Lord, the Christ must be more than merely David's descendant. The question points to the divine sonship that Peter confessed (Matthew 16:16) and that the Sadducees' arguments implicitly denied: the Christ is both David's son (fully human, born in David's line) and David's Lord (fully divine, worshipped by David).