Luke 14
The chapter's Sabbath healing of the man with dropsy is the setup for two table teachings: take the lowest seat (the self-exalted will be humbled; the self-humbled will be exalted) and invite the poor, crippled, blind, and lame rather than those who can reciprocate, because your reward will come at the resurrection. The Great Banquet parable — a man whose invited guests all make excuses, so the streets and country lanes are invited instead — is the enacted response to the pious observation blessed is the one who will eat at the feast in the kingdom of God. The cost-of-discipleship teachings are the chapter's most demanding: hate family and even your own life (by comparison with the kingdom's claim), take up your cross daily, give up everything you have. The tower-builder and the king-going-to-war parables communicate that uninformed commitment is worse than no commitment: count the cost before you begin. The salt saying closes with the warning that saltless salt is useless — the disciple who abandons the costly commitment has lost the distinctive quality that made the commitment meaningful.
Luke 14:1
One Sabbath, when Jesus went to eat in the house of a prominent Pharisee, he was being carefully watched — the third Sabbath dinner in Luke (5:29, 7:36, and now 14:1). Being carefully watched (paratēroumenoi, watching closely, under surveillance): the dinner invitation is also a scrutiny operation. The prominent Pharisee's table is where Jesus will be observed and tested.
Luke 14:2
There in front of him was a man suffering from abnormal swelling of his body — the man with dropsy (hydrops, abnormal accumulation of fluid in the body) is placed in front of Jesus: the setup for the Sabbath healing question. Whether he was planted to test Jesus or arrived independently, his presence creates the situation.
Luke 14:3
Jesus asked the Pharisees and experts in the law, is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath or not? — Jesus asks the question before healing rather than healing and then defending (as in the earlier Sabbath controversies). Is it lawful: the legal question is addressed to the legal experts directly.
Luke 14:4
But they remained silent. So Jesus took hold of the man, healed him and sent him on his way — the silence of the Pharisees and experts is the refusal to answer the question they know Jesus will use against them. Jesus interprets the silence as implicit permission (or simply proceeds with the healing): took hold of the man, healed him, sent him on his way. The healing is complete before the argument begins.
Luke 14:5
Then he asked them, if one of you has a child or an ox that falls into a well on the Sabbath day, will you not immediately pull it out? — the child-or-ox-in-a-well argument is the Sabbath emergency precedent: no one leaves a child (or animal) in a well to observe the Sabbath rest. The emergency overrides the restriction. The man with dropsy is at least as urgent as a child in a well.