“There were some present at that very time who told him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices.”
At that time some people who were present told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices — the report functions as a theodicy question: were these Galileans worse sinners, that they suffered such a death? Jesus explicitly refuses the sin-disaster causation formula: No, I tell you, but unless you repent, you too will all perish. The victims' tragedy becomes a summons to the questioners' repentance.
Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices. Jesus answered, 'Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I tell you, no.' Jesus is directly breaking the connection between suffering and sin. People assumed the murdered Galileans must have done something to deserve death. Jesus says no. Suffering doesn't mean you did wrong. Bad things happen to innocent people. Full stop. I grew up with theology that said suffering is always punishment or growth opportunity. But Jesus seems to allow for the possibility that sometimes terrible things are just terrible. They're not God's will. They're not producing spiritual fruit. They're unjust. And God grieves them. That's been important for me in therapy around childhood trauma—I don't have to extract spiritual meaning. I don't have to…
“There were some present at that very time who told him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices.”
At that time some people who were present told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices — the report functions as a theodicy question: were these Galileans worse sinners, that they suffered such a death? Jesus explicitly refuses the sin-disaster causation formula: No, I tell you, but unless you repent, you too will all perish. The victims' tragedy becomes a summons to the questioners' repentance.
Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices. Jesus answered, 'Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I tell you, no.' Jesus is directly breaking the connection between suffering and sin. People assumed the murdered Galileans must have done something to deserve death. Jesus says no. Suffering doesn't mean you did wrong. Bad things happen to innocent people. Full stop. I grew up with theology that said suffering is always punishment or growth opportunity. But Jesus seems to allow for the possibility that sometimes terrible things are just terrible. They're not God's will. They're not producing spiritual fruit. They're unjust. And God grieves them. That's been important for me in therapy around childhood trauma—I don't have to extract spiritual meaning. I don't have to…
At that time some people who were present told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices — the report functions as a theodicy question: were these Galileans worse sinners, that they suffered such a death? Jesus explicitly refuses the sin-disaster causation formula: No, I tell you, but unless you repent, you too will all perish. The victims' tragedy becomes a summons to the questioners' repentance.