HolyStudy
Bible IndexRead BibleNotesChurchesMissionPrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurchesSign in
HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurches
Sign in

Judges 14

1

And Samson went down to Timnath, and saw a woman in Timnath of the daughters of the Philistines.

1
2

And he came up, and told his father and his mother, and said, I have seen a woman in Timnath of the daughters of the Philistines: now therefore get her for me to wife.

3

Then his father and his mother said unto him, Is there never a woman among the daughters of thy brethren, or among all my people, that thou goest to take a wife of the uncircumcised Philistines? And Samson said unto his father, Get her for me; for she pleaseth me well.

1
4

But his father and his mother knew not that it was of the Lord, that he sought an occasion against the Philistines: for at that time the Philistines had dominion over Israel.

5

Then went Samson down, and his father and his mother, to Timnath, and came to the vineyards of Timnath: and, behold, a young lion roared against him.

6

And the Spirit of the Lord came mightily upon him, and he rent him as he would have rent a kid, and he had nothing in his hand: but he told not his father or his mother what he had done.

1
7

And he went down, and talked with the woman; and she pleased Samson well.

8

And after a time he returned to take her, and he turned aside to see the carcase of the lion: and, behold, there was a swarm of bees and honey in the carcase of the lion.

9

And he took thereof in his hands, and went on eating, and came to his father and mother, and he gave them, and they did eat: but he told not them that he had taken the honey out of the carcase of the lion.

10

So his father went down unto the woman: and Samson made there a feast; for so used the young men to do.

11

And it came to pass, when they saw him, that they brought thirty companions to be with him.

12

And Samson said unto them, I will now put forth a riddle unto you: if ye can certainly declare it me within the seven days of the feast, and find it out, then I will give you thirty sheets and thirty change of garments:

13

But if ye cannot declare it me, then shall ye give me thirty sheets and thirty change of garments. And they said unto him, Put forth thy riddle, that we may hear it.

14

And he said unto them, Out of the eater came forth meat, and out of the strong came forth sweetness. And they could not in three days expound the riddle.

15

And it came to pass on the seventh day, that they said unto Samson’s wife, Entice thy husband, that he may declare unto us the riddle, lest we burn thee and thy father’s house with fire: have ye called us to take that we have? is it not so?

16

And Samson’s wife wept before him, and said, Thou dost but hate me, and lovest me not: thou hast put forth a riddle unto the children of my people, and hast not told it me. And he said unto her, Behold, I have not told it my father nor my mother, and shall I tell it thee?

17

And she wept before him the seven days, while their feast lasted: and it came to pass on the seventh day, that he told her, because she lay sore upon him: and she told the riddle to the children of her people.

1
18

And the men of the city said unto him on the seventh day before the sun went down, What is sweeter than honey? and what is stronger than a lion? And he said unto them, If ye had not plowed with my heifer, ye had not found out my riddle.

19

And the Spirit of the Lord came upon him, and he went down to Ashkelon, and slew thirty men of them, and took their spoil, and gave change of garments unto them which expounded the riddle. And his anger was kindled, and he went up to his father’s house.

20

But Samson’s wife was given to his companion, whom he had used as his friend.

1
← Previous ChapterNext Chapter →

Judges 14

Samson falls in love with a Philistine woman of Timnah, violating the covenant principle against marriage with foreigners ('She's the right one for me,' Judges 14:3, shows no covenant consciousness), and uses the occasion of his betrothal feast to pose a riddle to the Philistine guests: 'Out of the eater came something to eat, out of the strong came something sweet' (14:14, referring to honey found in the carcass of a lion Samson slew). When the Philistines torture Samson's bride to extract the riddle's answer, Samson slaughters thirty Philistines to pay the debt, demonstrating that his physical prowess is immense yet his moral judgment is flawed and his relationships are destructive. The phrase 'the Spirit of the LORD came powerfully upon him' (14:6, 19) shows that divine empowerment does not require personal virtue, yet the narrative's ironic tone suggests that this separation of power from righteousness is precisely the problem: Samson uses his God-given strength for personal vengeance and lustful pursuits rather than to deliver Israel systematically. The chapter establishes the tragic pattern: Samson is mighty yet foolish, strong yet prone to compromise.

Judges 14:1

Samson's journey to Timnah and his sight of a Philistine woman who captures his desire establishes the beginning of Samson's narrative arc and introduces the problematic character who will dominate much of his account. The straightforward statement that he "saw a woman of the Philistines" and "she pleased him" reveals Samson's impulsive nature and his susceptibility to physical attraction. The fact that the woman is Philistine—Israel's foremost enemy—raises immediate theological concerns about endogamy and covenant boundaries. This opening action contrasts sharply with Samson's Nazirite dedication and consecration to God, suggesting that despite his spiritual commission, Samson will struggle to honor the requirements of his calling.

Judges 14:2

Samson's direct command to his parents to arrange a marriage with the Philistine woman reveals his assumption of authority in matters of marital selection and his willingness to override parental judgment. The phrase "get her for me as my wife" demonstrates Samson's peremptory tone and his expectation that his parents will comply with his demand. The instruction to his parents suggests that Samson, despite his divine calling and supernatural strength, remains subject to family structure and parental authority, yet his imperious tone suggests he expects compliance. His statement that the woman "pleases me" reflects his basis for the marital choice as physical attraction rather than religious compatibility or covenant considerations.

Judges 14:3

Samson's parents' objection—asking why he should marry an uncircumcised Philistine woman—raises the fundamental religious boundary of circumcision and covenant membership that Samson is transgressing through his choice. The parents' objection reflects orthodox covenantal concern about exogamy and the spiritual incompatibility of marriage between an Israelite and a Philistine. The question format suggests parental attempt to reason with Samson and to appeal to his religious understanding, though the weakness of their objection (they merely question rather than forbid) suggests either their powerlessness in the face of Samson's determination or their inability to enforce their authority. The parents' concern about covenant boundaries contrasts sharply with Samson's apparent indifference to the religious implications of his choice.

Judges 14:4

The narrator's explanation—"His parents did not know that this was from the Lord, who was seeking an occasion to confront the Philistines"—suggests that despite Samson's apparent impulsiveness and covenant violation, God is using his attraction to the Philistine woman as means to initiate conflict with the Philistines. The divine purpose embedded in Samson's choice reflects God's sovereignty and the capacity to use even problematic human choices to accomplish covenantal purposes. Yet the statement that the parents did not understand God's purposes raises theological questions about whether knowledge of divine intention would justify or explain Samson's covenant violation. The verse suggests that God's purposes transcend human understanding and that God can accomplish divine will through means that appear to violate or contradict covenant requirements.

Judges 14:5

Samson's descent toward Timnah with his parents for the marriage arrangements is interrupted by his encounter with a young lion, which he kills with his bare hands, demonstrating the extraordinary strength that characterizes his Nazirite-empowered existence. The detail that he killed the lion "as he would have torn a young goat" emphasizes the ease with which Samson dispatched the fierce beast, suggesting strength far beyond ordinary human capacity. The lion encounter foreshadows Samson's ability to accomplish feats of strength that would be impossible for ordinary warriors and establishes the physical prowess that will characterize his later conflicts with the Philistines. Yet the narrative makes no mention of Samson's father, suggesting that perhaps the father remained behind while Samson and his mother approached Timnah, or that Samson separated from his parents during this incident.

Judges 14:6

The statement that the Spirit of the Lord came upon Samson powerfully during the lion encounter suggests that divine empowerment was necessary for Samson to accomplish this feat and that the Spirit's action enables extraordinary strength beyond normal human capability. The phrase "came upon him in power" emphasizes the intensity of the Spirit's work and suggests a moment of divine possession where Samson becomes instrument of supernatural force. Yet notably, Samson tells neither his parents nor the Philistine woman's family about the encounter, keeping the incident secret and revealing knowledge only later when he uses the lion's corpse as basis for a riddle. The silence about this private encounter suggests Samson's tendency toward secrecy and his possible awareness that his parents would view the incident as evidence of divine empowerment.

Judges 14:7

Samson's return to Timnah to take the woman he loves and his conversation with the woman who pleased him establishes the marriage process and confirms his commitment to the Philistine woman despite his parents' objections. The detail that he spoke with the woman suggests developing relationship and communication between the betrothed pair, moving beyond mere physical attraction toward some form of personal connection. The sequence of events—encounter with lion, conversation with woman, marriage arrangements—suggests Samson's compartmentalization of different aspects of his experience and his ability to move between sacred empowerment and ordinary social interaction. Yet the parallel structure of verses (lion encounter, conversation with woman) may suggest that these occurred during the same journey toward Timnah.

Judges 14:8

Samson's return to the lion's carcass sometime later and his discovery of a swarm of bees with honey inside the dead lion combines grotesque imagery (decomposing carcass inhabited by productive bees) with divine abundance (honey produced in unlikely circumstances). The discovery of honey in the lion suggests the principle that life and blessing can emerge from death and destruction, creating productive value from otherwise useless remains. Yet the detail is also problematic from a Nazirite perspective: honey consumption may have been acceptable under Nazirite law (unlike wine and fermented drinks), but eating from an unclean source (a dead lion's carcass) would create ritual impurity incompatible with Nazirite dedication. Samson's consumption of the honey represents his first clear violation of Nazirite purity requirements.

Judges 14:9

Samson's collection of honey and his offering of some to his parents establishes that he shares the honey with them without revealing its unusual origin in the lion's carcass. The sharing with parents suggests Samson's attempt to involve them in the discovered abundance, though the deception about the source reveals his willingness to deceive even those closest to him. The fact that the parents ate the honey without knowledge of its origin suggests Samson's ability to deceive and his comfort with secrecy regarding matters that would violate covenant or Nazirite purity. The verse does not explicitly state that eating honey contaminates his Nazirite vow, yet the concealment of the source suggests Samson's awareness that his parents might object if they knew the true origin.

Judges 14:10

Samson's journey to the woman's family, his arrangement of a wedding celebration, and the gathering of thirty companions for the feast establish the marriage ceremony and the social context for the subsequent riddle contest. The provision of thirty companions suggests a major celebration appropriate to a significant marriage alliance, and the Philistine hosts' provision of these companions may have been customary wedding protocol. The feast context establishes the setting for the riddle that Samson will pose, transforming the joyful occasion into the venue for a contest of wits. The detail that the woman's family provided the companions for Samson may suggest their importance in the social configuration of the wedding.

Judges 14:11

Samson's public proposal of a riddle to the thirty companions—with stakes of thirty linen garments and thirty changes of clothes for the winner—introduces the intellectual competition that will dominate the remainder of chapter 14. The substantial stakes suggest serious commitment to the wager and the importance Samson places on the riddle contest. The offer of valuable clothing as prizes establishes the competition's significance and suggests that Samson either possesses substantial wealth or has confidence that he will not need to pay the stakes. The gathering of thirty companions as the audience and participants in the riddle suggests a formal public competition rather than private entertainment.

Judges 14:12

Samson's riddle—"Out of the eater, something to eat; out of the strong, something sweet"—derives from his earlier experience with the lion and the honey found in its carcass, creating a riddle that Samson alone can solve because only he knows the source material. The riddle's structure invokes paradox: the strong lion becomes means of sweet honey production, death produces life, and destruction produces abundance. The conciseness and wit of the riddle demonstrate Samson's intelligence and his capacity for abstract thinking, suggesting intellectual capacity that complements his physical strength. Yet the riddle's basis in private experience and deception foreshadows Samson's pattern of using knowledge gained through dishonest means to disadvantage others.

Judges 14:13

The thirty companions' acceptance of the riddle challenge and their confidence in their ability to solve it within three days establish the competition's formal parameters and the stakes' seriousness. The three-day time limit creates urgency and suggests that the companions believe they should be capable of solving the riddle through reason and discussion. Yet the paradoxical nature of the riddle and its basis in Samson's private knowledge make solution through logical reasoning alone impossible, suggesting that the companions' confidence may be overconfident. The companions' participation in the wager suggests the formal nature of the competition and the community's stakes in the outcome.

Judges 14:14

The companions' failure after three days to solve the riddle establishes Samson's intellectual advantage and his ability to pose challenges that exceed his opponents' capacity. The continued failure to solve the riddle suggests that purely rational thought cannot unlock the mystery based on Samson's private knowledge. Yet the companions' request for a clue or explanation—"If you will tell us before the seven days of the feast are over, we will give you the answer"—suggests they recognize their defeat and attempt to negotiate rather than continue the futile search. The mention of seven days suggests that the feast will continue beyond the initial three days, allowing extended time for attempted solution.

Judges 14:15

The companions' appeal to Samson's bride on the fourth day—requesting that she coax Samson into revealing the riddle's answer—introduces a critical turning point where the Philistine woman becomes instrument of deception and manipulation. The companions' specific threat—that they will burn her and her father's household if she fails to obtain the answer—establishes that the stakes have escalated dramatically and that the woman faces existential danger. The appeal to the woman suggests the companions' recognition that she may have greater influence over Samson than they do, and that access to Samson through his bride may provide the solution they cannot achieve through direct intellectual engagement. The threat also reveals the ruthlessness of the Philistine cultural context and the willingness to use violence to settle disputes.

Judges 14:16

The Philistine woman's appeal to Samson—weeping and accusing him of hating her because he refuses to share the riddle's answer—demonstrates manipulative emotional tactics designed to extract the desired information. The woman's accusation that Samson loves her but refuses to share the riddle suggests that emotional intimacy should entail mutual disclosure and trust. The woman's use of tears and emotional distress as tools of manipulation reveals her agency and her willingness to use whatever means available to protect herself and her family from the threatened violence. Samson's earlier assertion that the woman "pleased" him suggested physical attraction rather than deep emotional connection, making him vulnerable to the woman's emotional appeals.

Judges 14:17

Samson's capitulation after the woman's persistent pressure throughout the seven feast days—yielding the riddle's solution because of her tears and emotional appeals—reveals Samson's weakness in the face of emotional manipulation despite his physical strength. The narrative's statement that she had "nagged" Samson throughout the week suggests that the woman applied continuous pressure designed to wear down his resistance. The fact that Samson yielded after sustained emotional assault demonstrates that his extraordinary strength does not translate to moral or psychological resilience. The woman's success in obtaining the answer through manipulation rather than logical reasoning demonstrates her intelligence and her capacity to overcome Samson's superior knowledge through alternative strategic means.

Judges 14:18

The woman's transmission of the riddle's answer to the thirty companions before sunset on the seventh day fulfills the threat's implicit deadline and ensures that the companions can provide the solution first. The answer—"What is sweeter than honey? What is stronger than a lion?"—demonstrates interpretation of the riddle and the logical reasoning that the companions could not achieve independently. Yet the answer merely reformulates the riddle rather than truly solving it, suggesting that the companions understood the paradox but not the basis material (the lion and honey). Samson's immediate recognition that only the woman could have revealed the answer demonstrates his understanding of the manipulation and betrayal.

Judges 14:19

Samson's angry response—spirit-empowered journey to Ashkelon, killing of thirty Philistine men, and seizure of their garments to pay the wager—represents escalation from intellectual competition to violent warfare triggered by his sense of betrayal. The Spirit of the Lord's involvement in Samson's actions suggests divine empowerment of the violent response, yet raises theological questions about whether the murder of innocent Philistines was justified response to Samson's embarrassment. The acquisition of clothing through murder rather than fair competition reveals Samson's willingness to use violence to honor the wager and his refusal to accept defeat gracefully. The stark movement from Timnah wedding to Ashkelon murder demonstrates the violence lurking beneath Samson's public persona and his capacity for unprovoked aggression when angered.

Judges 14:20

The notice that Samson's wife was given to his best man establishes the final severing of the marital relationship and suggests that the wedding was unconsummated or that the bride was reassigned to another partner. The father-in-law's action in giving the daughter to another man may represent a legal dissolution of the marriage after the wager dispute and violence, or an attempt to maintain the wedding celebration by redistributing the bride. The conclusion of chapter 14 leaves Samson estranged from his bride, having killed Philistines, seized their possessions, and damaged his marital relationship through his loss of temper and violent response. This tragic conclusion establishes the pattern that Samson's relationships with Philistine women end in violence and separation, suggesting the fundamental incompatibility of Israel and Philistine worlds that Samson's marriages attempt to bridge.