“He answered, “Whether he is a sinner I do not know. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see.””
He answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not: one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see — the man refuses to be drawn into the authorities' framework. 'Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not'—he does not claim to know Jesus's moral status. But there is 'one thing I know' (oida . . . hoti): the transformation of his own condition. His blindness is replaced by sight; that fact is undeniable and immediate. The man's logic is brilliant: he bases his witness not on theological arguments about Jesus but on his own experienced transformation. The authorities cannot argue with his testimony to his own sight.
Community Reflections
No notes on this verse yet
Be the first to write a note about this verse.
John 9:25
“He answered, “Whether he is a sinner I do not know. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see.””
He answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not: one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see — the man refuses to be drawn into the authorities' framework. 'Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not'—he does not claim to know Jesus's moral status. But there is 'one thing I know' (oida . . . hoti): the transformation of his own condition. His blindness is replaced by sight; that fact is undeniable and immediate. The man's logic is brilliant: he bases his witness not on theological arguments about Jesus but on his own experienced transformation. The authorities cannot argue with his testimony to his own sight.
He answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not: one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see — the man refuses to be drawn into the authorities' framework. 'Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not'—he does not claim to know Jesus's moral status. But there is 'one thing I know' (oida . . . hoti): the transformation of his own condition. His blindness is replaced by sight; that fact is undeniable and immediate. The man's logic is brilliant: he bases his witness not on theological arguments about Jesus but on his own experienced transformation. The authorities cannot argue with his testimony to his own sight.