“Others said, “These are not the words of one who is oppressed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?””
But others said, 'These are not the sayings of a man possessed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?' — the defenders of Jesus appeal to His signs, particularly the healing of the blind man (John 9), as evidence that His words come from God, not from demonic deception. The rhetorical question assumes that demonic powers work to blind and destroy, not to restore sight and give life. This appeal to works as validation of Jesus' claims is significant throughout John's Gospel.
Community Reflections
No reflections on this verse yet
Be the first to write a reflection about this verse.
John 10:21
“Others said, “These are not the words of one who is oppressed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?””
But others said, 'These are not the sayings of a man possessed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?' — the defenders of Jesus appeal to His signs, particularly the healing of the blind man (John 9), as evidence that His words come from God, not from demonic deception. The rhetorical question assumes that demonic powers work to blind and destroy, not to restore sight and give life. This appeal to works as validation of Jesus' claims is significant throughout John's Gospel.
Community Reflections
No reflections on this verse yet
Be the first to write a reflection about this verse.
But others said, 'These are not the sayings of a man possessed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?' — the defenders of Jesus appeal to His signs, particularly the healing of the blind man (John 9), as evidence that His words come from God, not from demonic deception. The rhetorical question assumes that demonic powers work to blind and destroy, not to restore sight and give life. This appeal to works as validation of Jesus' claims is significant throughout John's Gospel.