HolyStudy
Bible IndexRead BibleNotesChurchesMissionPrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurchesSign in
HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurches
Sign in

Exodus 22

1

If a man shall steal an ox, or a sheep, and kill it, or sell it; he shall restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep.

2

If a thief be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him.

3

If the sun be risen upon him, there shall be blood shed for him; for he should make full restitution; if he have nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.

4

If the theft be certainly found in his hand alive, whether it be ox, or ass, or sheep; he shall restore double.

5

If a man shall cause a field or vineyard to be eaten, and shall put in his beast, and shall feed in another man’s field; of the best of his own field, and of the best of his own vineyard, shall he make restitution.

6

If fire break out, and catch in thorns, so that the stacks of corn, or the standing corn, or the field, be consumed therewith; he that kindled the fire shall surely make restitution.

7

If a man shall deliver unto his neighbour money or stuff to keep, and it be stolen out of the man’s house; if the thief be found, let him pay double.

8

If the thief be not found, then the master of the house shall be brought unto the judges, to see whether he have put his hand unto his neighbour’s goods.

9

For all manner of trespass, whether it be for ox, for ass, for sheep, for raiment, or for any manner of lost thing, which another challengeth to be his, the cause of both parties shall come before the judges; and whom the judges shall condemn, he shall pay double unto his neighbour.

10

If a man deliver unto his neighbour an ass, or an ox, or a sheep, or any beast, to keep; and it die, or be hurt, or driven away, no man seeing it:

11

Then shall an oath of the Lord be between them both, that he hath not put his hand unto his neighbour’s goods; and the owner of it shall accept thereof, and he shall not make it good.

12

And if it be stolen from him, he shall make restitution unto the owner thereof.

13

If it be torn in pieces, then let him bring it for witness, and he shall not make good that which was torn.

14

And if a man borrow ought of his neighbour, and it be hurt, or die, the owner thereof being not with it, he shall surely make it good.

15

But if the owner thereof be with it, he shall not make it good: if it be an hired thing, it came for his hire.

16

And if a man entice a maid that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely endow her to be his wife.

17

If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him, he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins.

18

Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.

1
19

Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death.

20

He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the Lord only, he shall be utterly destroyed.

21

Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.

1
22

Ye shall not afflict any widow, or fatherless child.

23

If thou afflict them in any wise, and they cry at all unto me, I will surely hear their cry;

24

And my wrath shall wax hot, and I will kill you with the sword; and your wives shall be widows, and your children fatherless.

1
25

If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury.

26

If thou at all take thy neighbour’s raiment to pledge, thou shalt deliver it unto him by that the sun goeth down:

27

For that is his covering only, it is his raiment for his skin: wherein shall he sleep? and it shall come to pass, when he crieth unto me, that I will hear; for I am gracious.

28

Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people.

29

Thou shalt not delay to offer the first of thy ripe fruits, and of thy liquors: the firstborn of thy sons shalt thou give unto me.

30

Likewise shalt thou do with thine oxen, and with thy sheep: seven days it shall be with his dam; on the eighth day thou shalt give it me.

31

And ye shall be holy men unto me: neither shall ye eat any flesh that is torn of beasts in the field; ye shall cast it to the dogs.

← Previous ChapterNext Chapter →

Exodus 22

Exodus 22 continues the covenant law code with cases covering theft, property damage, sexual ethics, treatment of vulnerable people, and obligations to God. The penalties for theft are calibrated to the type of property and the circumstances — a thief who cannot repay must be sold into servitude; restitution rates vary for livestock stolen versus recovered. If a man seduces a virgin who is not betrothed, he must pay the bride price and marry her. Sorcery is forbidden entirely. Three categories of person receive special protection: the foreigner, the widow, and the orphan — and God's stated reason is extraordinary: I will hear their cry, for I am compassionate. Lending at interest to the poor is prohibited. God's claim on Israel's firstfruits and firstborn is restated. The section concludes with a call to holiness grounded in identity: you shall be holy people to me. The laws protecting vulnerable people are not peripheral to Israel's covenant with God but central to it — Leviticus 19:34 and Matthew 25:35–40 both make the same claim. How a community treats those with no power to protect themselves reveals what it actually believes about the God it worships.

Exodus 22:14

If anyone borrows an animal from their neighbor and it is injured or dies while the owner is not present, they must make restitution. The borrower's liability is stricter than the custodian's: when you borrow an animal for your benefit and it dies in your care, you are responsible for making it right — the owner took no benefit from the arrangement. The borrowed animal is in the borrower's use and care; its death or injury is the borrower's loss to bear. Luke 14:28–30 says count the cost before you build, before you commit — the liability that attaches to borrowed animals is part of counting the cost of entering any arrangement that involves responsibility for another person's property.

Exodus 22:1

If anyone steals an ox or a sheep and slaughters it or sells it, they must pay back five head of cattle for the ox and four sheep for the sheep. The theft law begins with the most economically significant animals and the most complete form of theft: slaughter or sale makes recovery impossible, so the penalty is multiplied. Five cattle for an ox, four sheep for a sheep — the higher ratio for cattle reflects the ox's greater economic value as a work animal, not only food. Proverbs 6:30–31 says people do not despise a thief if he steals to satisfy his hunger when he is starving — even so, if he is caught, he must pay sevenfold. The multiplication of restitution above the original value is the law's way of making theft economically unattractive and restorative justice proportionally consequential.

Exodus 22:2

If a thief is caught breaking in at night and is struck a fatal blow, the defender is not guilty of bloodshed. The nocturnal break-in justifies lethal force in self-defense — the darkness makes intentions unknowable and the threat potentially lethal. The law recognizes the legitimate use of force to protect household and family against an unknown nighttime intruder. Proverbs 24:11 says rescue those being led away to death — the protective instinct that the law permits at night is the same instinct the Proverb requires toward the vulnerable. The provision for self-defense against the nocturnal intruder is the law's recognition that households have the right to protect themselves when the threat of violence cannot be assessed.

Exodus 22:3

But if it happens after sunrise, the defender is guilty of bloodshed. A thief who is caught must pay, but if they have nothing, they must be sold to pay for their theft. The daylight distinction changes the calculus: a daytime intruder can be seen, identified, and restrained without lethal force. The killing of a daytime thief is disproportionate — it is not justified self-defense but an excessive response to a property crime. The thief who cannot pay is sold — not executed — demonstrating that the law values human life above property even for the guilty. The principle that theft is a property crime redeemable by labor rather than a capital offense reflects the law's hierarchy of values: human life is worth more than property.

Exodus 22:4

If the stolen animal is found alive in their possession — whether ox, donkey or sheep — they must pay back double. The double restitution for theft in which the animal is recovered alive is less severe than the four- or five-fold restitution of verse 1, where the animal has been slaughtered or sold. The law calibrates the penalty to the degree of harm: recoverable theft requires less restitution than irrecoverable theft. Luke 19:8 records Zacchaeus voluntarily offering to pay back four times the amount he had cheated people — his standard exceeds the law's requirement for irrecoverable theft and demonstrates the generosity that genuine repentance produces beyond mere legal compliance.

Exodus 22:5

If anyone grazes their livestock in a field or vineyard and lets them stray and they graze in someone else's field, the offender must make restitution from the best of their own field or vineyard. The principle of making restitution from the best of what you have — not from the worst — establishes that restitution is not merely technical compliance but a genuine demonstration of valuing the other person's loss. To compensate from the worst would be to minimize the harm done; to compensate from the best is to honor the loss at its actual value. Numbers 18:29 requires Levites to present the best and holiest part of every offering to God — the same principle of offering the best applies to restitution as to worship.

Exodus 22:6

If a fire breaks out and spreads into thornbushes so that it burns shocks of grain or standing grain or the whole field, the one who started the fire must make restitution. The fire that spreads beyond its intended boundary creates liability for the harm it causes. The one who started the fire is responsible for controlling it. If it spreads and destroys another person's crop, the arsonist — even if unintentional — must make restitution. The principle of responsibility for foreseeable consequences of one's actions runs throughout this section of the law. James 3:5 says the tongue is a small part of the body, but it makes great boasts; consider what a great forest is set on fire by a small spark. The spreading fire is James' metaphor precisely because of its legal resonance in the Torah.

Exodus 22:7

If anyone gives a neighbor silver or goods for safekeeping and they are stolen from the neighbor's house, the thief, if caught, must pay back double. The law of entrusted property begins: when you give something to a neighbor for safekeeping, the neighbor has assumed responsibility for it. If it is stolen, the thief must pay double — but the neighbor who was the custodian is not personally liable if he is innocent of the theft. Luke 12:48 says from everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked. The principle of heightened responsibility for what has been entrusted runs through the New Testament in the stewardship parables and connects to the custodial responsibility of Exodus 22:7.

Exodus 22:8

But if the thief is not found, the owner of the house must appear before the judges, and they must determine whether the owner of the house has laid hands on the other person's property. When the thief cannot be found, the question becomes whether the custodian was complicit in the theft. The judges — the same judicial structure Jethro recommended — determine innocence or guilt. The legal process is transparent and accountable: neither side's claim is automatically accepted. Romans 13:1–4 grounds the legitimacy of governing authorities in God's own ordering of human society — the judges of Exodus 22:8 are early instantiations of the legitimate human authority that Paul describes.

Exodus 22:9

In all cases of illegal possession of an ox, a donkey, a sheep, a garment, or any other lost property about which somebody says, this is mine, both parties are to bring their cases before the judges. The court's role in disputed property claims is comprehensive: any disputed possession comes before the judges. The bilateral process — both parties present their cases — is the basis of fair adjudication. Deuteronomy 19:15 requires two or three witnesses for any charge — the judicial process of Exodus 22:9 is the foundation on which the evidentiary requirements of Deuteronomy are built. The court that hears both parties before deciding is the model of justice that Proverbs 18:17 describes: in a lawsuit the first to speak seems right, until someone comes forward and cross-examines.

Exodus 22:10

If anyone gives a donkey, an ox, a sheep or any other animal to their neighbor for safekeeping and it dies or is injured or is taken away while no one is looking. The custodial responsibility law is applied to living animals: what happens when an animal in your care dies or is injured without any apparent negligence? The death of an animal in custody creates a potential dispute about whether the custodian was responsible. The law must handle both the facts (animal died) and the unknowable (what happened to it). Verse 11 will resolve the uncertainty through the oath — when facts are inaccessible, the covenant commitment to truthfulness becomes the adjudicative mechanism.

Exodus 22:11

The issue of the Lord's oath between them will decide who has taken the other's property. The other party is to accept the oath, and no restitution needs to be made. The oath — sworn before God — is the ultimate truthfulness mechanism in the covenant community. When no witnesses exist and no evidence can settle the matter, the integrity of the oath before God determines the outcome. Hebrews 6:16–17 says people swear by someone greater than themselves, and the oath confirms what is said and puts an end to all argument — God himself swore by the greatest, by himself. The oath in Exodus 22:11 is the covenantal truth-telling mechanism that human courts cannot substitute for; God sees what no witness sees.

Exodus 22:12

But if the animal was stolen from the neighbor, restitution must be made to the owner. The distinction between theft (the custodian's negligence or complicity) and unavoidable harm (death without negligence) is maintained. If the animal was stolen, someone was careless or complicit — restitution is required. If the animal died from natural causes without negligence, the oath settles it. The law's granular case distinctions reflect the variety of real situations that arise between neighbors, and the consistent principle: carelessness that produces harm requires restitution; unavoidable harm requires truthfulness but not punishment. Luke 16:10 says whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much — the custodial responsibility laws establish the standard for trustworthiness with others' property.

Exodus 22:13

If it was torn to pieces by a wild animal, the neighbor shall bring in the remains as evidence; no restitution needs to be made for the torn animal. The remains as evidence is a specific legal provision: producing the carcass demonstrates that the animal died from a predator, not from negligence or theft. The evidence requirement protects the custodian who is genuinely innocent while preventing false claims. Genesis 31:39 records Jacob telling Laban: I did not bring you animals torn by wild beasts; I bore the loss myself. And you demanded payment from me for whatever was stolen by day or night — Jacob's complaint is the inverse of Exodus 22:13: he absorbed losses that the law says should have been attributed to the unavoidable hazard. The law of Exodus 22:13 corrects what Laban demanded.

Exodus 22:15

But if the owner is with the animal, the owner must accept the loss. It is different if the animal was hired; the money paid for the hire covers the loss. The presence of the owner during the incident shifts the liability: the owner who is present and witnesses the harm cannot then claim against the borrower for something that happened under the owner's own supervision. The hired-animal case introduces the principle that insurance is embedded in hire prices — the cost of borrowing a hired animal includes the risk of its death or injury. The economic principle that risk pricing is legitimate is the seed of actuarial thinking. Proverbs 22:3 says the prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty. Accounting for risk in advance is wisdom, not excessive caution.

Exodus 22:16

If a man seduces a virgin who is not pledged to be married and sleeps with her, he must pay the bride-price, and she shall be his wife. Sexual ethics are addressed in the legal code as a matter of covenant community integrity. The seduction of an unmarried, unengaged woman creates an obligation: the man has taken the bride without paying for her. The bride-price represents the economic and covenantal transfer of the woman from her father's household to the man's. The law requires the man to complete what he has already begun — not only the sexual act but the covenant of marriage. The obligation is not to the woman alone but to the family structure that has been disrupted by the act.

Exodus 22:17

If her father absolutely refuses to give her to him, he must still pay the bride-price for virgins. Even if the father refuses the marriage, the man must pay the bride-price. The father's refusal is legitimate — he may judge the man unsuitable — but the economic harm done by the seduction still requires compensation. The woman's marriageability has been affected; the law ensures she and her family are not left worse off by the man's act. The law protects the woman's economic future even when the marriage cannot be remedied. Galatians 5:13 says do not use your freedom to indulge the flesh — the liberty available in the covenant community does not include the sexual taking of another person without covenant commitment.

Exodus 22:18

Do not allow a sorceress to live. The prohibition on sorcery is a covenant protection against the substitution of occult practice for dependence on the Lord. Sorcery represents the attempt to access divine-level power and knowledge through means other than the covenant relationship. Deuteronomy 18:10–12 lists sorcery, divination, and consulting the dead among the practices of the nations that Israel is to reject. 1 Samuel 15:23 says rebellion is like the sin of divination — the prophet equates the spirit of sorcery with the spirit of rebellion against God. The death penalty for sorcery reflects the severity of the covenant violation it represents: the community's life depends on its dependence on God, not on occult alternatives.

Exodus 22:19

Anyone who has sexual relations with an animal is to be put to death. The prohibition on bestiality is part of the sexual ethics section that also addresses seduction. The prohibition is absolute — no case distinctions, no graduated penalties. Leviticus 18:23–25 grounds all the sexual prohibitions in the character of the land: do not defile yourselves in any of these ways, because this is how the nations that I am going to drive out before you became defiled. The sexual ethics of the covenant community are not merely personal standards but communal conditions for life in the land. The boundaries between kinds — established in Genesis 1 through God's repeated after their kind — are honored by the prohibition on interspecies sexual relations.

Exodus 22:20

Whoever sacrifices to any god other than the Lord must be destroyed. The prohibition on sacrifice to other gods is the covenant exclusivity of the first commandment applied to the most concrete act of worship. Sacrifice is the most direct expression of religious allegiance in the ancient world — it is the act that defines which deity is your God. To sacrifice to another deity while within the covenant community is to sever the covenant bond at its most fundamental point. 1 Corinthians 10:20 says the sacrifices of pagans are offered to demons, not to God — the New Testament's prohibition on participating in pagan sacrifices is grounded in the same covenant exclusivity of Exodus 22:20.

Exodus 22:21

Do not mistreat or oppress a foreigner, for you were foreigners in Egypt. The protection of the foreigner is the covenant community's most explicit act of neighbor-love for those outside the community. The motivation — you were foreigners in Egypt — is the foundational ethical argument of the covenant: what you experienced, do not inflict on others. Leviticus 19:34 repeats this: the foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. Matthew 25:35 records Jesus saying: I was a stranger and you invited me in — the protection of the foreigner in Exodus 22:21 is the legal foundation of the eschatological judgment on how communities treat those who are vulnerable and outside.

Exodus 22:22

Do not take advantage of the widow or the fatherless child. After the foreigner, the widow and orphan — the three categories of the most vulnerable in ancient society who lack natural protectors. The widow has lost her husband's legal covering; the orphan has no parent; the foreigner has no family. All three are unprotected by the structures that protect everyone else. Isaiah 1:17 says learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow. James 1:27 says religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress. The Law, the Prophets, and the Epistle of James say the same thing: the treatment of the widow and orphan is the index of the covenant community's integrity.

Exodus 22:23

If you do and they cry out to me, I will certainly hear their cry. The divine guarantee: if the widow or orphan cries out to God, God will hear. The same divine hearing that responded to Israel's groan in Egypt applies to the widow and orphan within Israel. Psalm 68:5 says a father to the fatherless, a defender of widows, is God in his holy dwelling. The God who heard the groan of the enslaved Israelites is the God who hears the cry of every widow and orphan. The threat implied in you will and they will cry is that God's response to the cry of the vulnerable will be the same kind of response He gave to Israel's cry in Egypt: visible, powerful, and directed at those who caused the suffering.

Exodus 22:24

My anger will be aroused, and I will kill you with the sword; your wives will become widows and your children fatherless. The judgment for oppressing widows and orphans is to become what they are: the wives of the oppressors become widows, the children become orphans. The lex talionis applied to the social sphere: you have made others widows and orphans; you will know what it is to be that. The severity of the threatened judgment — the sword, widowhood, orphanhood — measures the severity of the covenant violation. Luke 18:3–7 records the parable of the persistent widow who cries out for justice against her adversary — the judge in the parable relents, and Jesus says how much more will God bring about justice for those who cry out to him.

Exodus 22:25

If you lend money to one of my people among you who is needy, do not treat it like a business deal; charge no interest. The prohibition on charging interest to the poor Israelite neighbor is one of the most radical economic provisions in the ancient world. In the surrounding cultures, interest on loans was standard practice. The covenant law prohibits it for loans to the poor within the community. Leviticus 25:35–37 and Deuteronomy 23:19–20 expand and apply this principle. Luke 6:35 says lend to them without expecting to get anything back — the New Testament extension of the interest prohibition is to all lending as an act of love. The economy of the covenant community is structured around mutual aid, not profit extraction.

Exodus 22:26

If you take your neighbor's cloak as a pledge, return it by sunset. The cloak taken as a pledge for a loan is the poor person's only covering — taking it overnight leaves the borrower without warmth at night. The law requires its return by sunset: the creditor's security interest does not extend to causing the debtor physical suffering. Deuteronomy 24:13 repeats this with the additional reason: it will be counted as righteous before the Lord your God. The return of the cloak is not only a legal obligation but a righteous act. The meeting of legal requirement and righteous character is characteristic of how the Torah sees covenant law: it is not external compliance but the expression of the kind of person the covenant is forming.

Exodus 22:27

Because that cloak is the only covering your neighbor has. What else can they sleep in? When they cry out to me, I will hear, for I am compassionate. The rhetorical question — what else can they sleep in? — is God's own statement of empathy for the poor borrower. The divine compassion that motivates the law is explicitly stated: I am compassionate. The same compassion that responded to Israel's cry in Egypt responds to the cry of the poor person shivering without their cloak. James 2:14–16 asks: what good is it if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? If a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food and you say, go in peace; keep warm and well fed, but do nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? The law of the cloak-pledge is the original case study for James' argument.

Exodus 22:28

Do not blaspheme God or curse the ruler of your people. The double prohibition — against blasphemy and against cursing rulers — pairs the divine and human authority structures. God and the ruler of the people are both to be spoken of with respect. Acts 23:5 records Paul, having inadvertently spoken against the high priest, immediately quoting this verse: do not speak evil about the ruler of your people. The reflexive application of the biblical law — even to the person who has wronged you — is the mark of a conscience formed by covenant ethics. 1 Peter 2:17 says honor everyone. Love the family of believers. Fear God. Honor the emperor. The four commands mirror the structure of Exodus 22:28 applied to the New Covenant context.

Exodus 22:29

Do not hold back offerings from your granaries or your vats. You must give me the firstborn of your sons. The principle of firstfruits belongs to the same theological structure as the firstborn consecration of Exodus 13: what produces first belongs to God. The granary and the vat — the grain harvest and the wine or oil press — yield their first produce to the Lord. The firstborn son follows. The principle is comprehensive: the first of everything that produces is God's, because God is the source of all production. Deuteronomy 26:1–11 institutionalizes the firstfruits offering as an act of liturgical memory: the first produce is brought to the sanctuary and the history of the Exodus is recited. The offering of the first is the covenant act that interprets all of the rest.

Exodus 22:30

Do the same with your cattle and your sheep. Let them stay with their mother for seven days, but give them to me on the eighth day. The seventh-day waiting period before the firstborn animal is given to God is a mercy for both the mother animal and the newborn: the first week of nursing before the separation. The eighth day is the same day as circumcision for human males — the covenant day that marks the transition from the uncircumcised to the covenant-marked. The giving of the firstborn animal on the eighth day aligns the liturgy of sacrifice with the liturgy of circumcision in the covenant rhythm. Leviticus 22:27 repeats this provision: it must be with its mother for seven days. From the eighth day on, it will be acceptable as a food offering.

Exodus 22:31

You are to be my holy people. So do not eat the meat of an animal torn by wild beasts; throw it to the dogs. The concluding verse of the chapter returns to the holiness identity that grounds the entire legal code: you are to be my holy people. The prohibition on eating torn meat — meat from an animal killed by a predator, whose blood has not been properly drained — is a dietary expression of the holiness identity. Leviticus 17:15 and Ezekiel 4:14 both relate to the same prohibition. The meat thrown to the dogs is not wasted but given to those for whom dietary holiness is not required. 1 Peter 2:9 repeats the holy people designation: you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God's special possession. The identity announced at Sinai and maintained through covenant law is claimed for the New Covenant community.