HolyStudy
Bible IndexRead BibleNotesChurchesMissionPrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurchesSign in
HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurches
Sign in

Ecclesiastes 6

1

There is an evil which I have seen under the sun, and it is common among men:

2

A man to whom God hath given riches, wealth, and honour, so that he wanteth nothing for his soul of all that he desireth, yet God giveth him not power to eat thereof, but a stranger eateth it: this is vanity, and it is an evil disease.

3

If a man beget an hundred children, and live many years, so that the days of his years be many, and his soul be not filled with good, and also that he have no burial; I say, that an untimely birth is better than he.

1
4

For he cometh in with vanity, and departeth in darkness, and his name shall be covered with darkness.

5

Moreover he hath not seen the sun, nor known any thing: this hath more rest than the other.

1
6

Yea, though he live a thousand years twice told, yet hath he seen no good: do not all go to one place?

7

All the labour of man is for his mouth, and yet the appetite is not filled.

1
8

For what hath the wise more than the fool? what hath the poor, that knoweth to walk before the living?

9

Better is the sight of the eyes than the wandering of the desire: this is also vanity and vexation of spirit.

10

That which hath been is named already, and it is known that it is man: neither may he contend with him that is mightier than he.

11

Seeing there be many things that increase vanity, what is man the better?

12

For who knoweth what is good for man in this life, all the days of his vain life which he spendeth as a shadow? for who can tell a man what shall be after him under the sun?

← Previous ChapterNext Chapter →

Ecclesiastes 6

The Preacher reflects on a grievous evil: a man who receives riches and honor from God, yet lacks nothing his heart desires, yet God does not grant him the ability to enjoy these gifts—instead, a stranger consumes them. Such a man is worse than one stillborn; both are futile, both enter darkness, both are forgotten. The Preacher notes that human appetites are never satisfied; the eyes and ears perpetually hunger for more. Much talking about life's troubles increases only futility. The Preacher raises a fundamental question: what advantage does a man possess over the beasts? This chapter departs from the quest for meaning into profound alienation: the possibility that one might possess everything yet enjoy nothing. The extended meditation on the stillborn child—who never sees the sun yet escapes toil and sorrow—suggests a dark envy of non-existence as preferable to a life of deprivation amid abundance. Literarily, the passage employs hyperbole and paradox to heighten the emotional and philosophical crisis. Theologically, this chapter reaches toward the abyss of meaninglessness, suggesting that without divine grace enabling enjoyment and satisfaction, possession itself becomes meaningless. The rhetorical question comparing human advantage to animal advantage verges on questioning human dignity itself, yet implicitly invites the reader to reconsider: if humans transcend beasts, what is that transcendence for, and where does it lead?

Ecclesiastes 6:9

The affirmation that what the eye sees is better than the wandering of desire represents a preference for concrete present reality over abstract fantasy. The person satisfied with what is present—rather than consumed with envious wanting of what they do not possess—achieves a kind of wisdom. This verse suggests that controlling the desires and expectations one entertains in imagination represents an important strategy for finding contentment.

Ecclesiastes 6:1

The observation of an evil that Qohelet has seen under the sun—a person given riches, wealth, and honor, lacking nothing, yet unable to enjoy them—presents a poignant paradox of external prosperity matched by internal deprivation. The phrase "weighs heavily upon him" suggests psychological or spiritual burden; the goods possess him rather than his possessing them. This verse illustrates the gap between outer circumstance and inner satisfaction that Ecclesiastes has emphasized throughout.

Ecclesiastes 6:2

The expansion that a stranger consumes the goods that God has given, not the person who has worked to acquire them, introduces the element of dispossession and loss. The goods, accumulated through effort, pass to another—whether through inheritance by an undeserving heir, or through theft, loss in commerce, or other mechanism. This verse reinforces earlier observations about the futility of accumulation; one cannot ensure that one's wealth benefits oneself.

Ecclesiastes 6:3

The statement that though a person has a hundred children and lives many years, if their soul finds no satisfaction and there is no burial, a stillborn child is better off than this person, extends the dark assessment of 4:2-3 into the realm of family and progeny. The large number of children and long life—indicators of blessing in biblical tradition—prove worthless if the person cannot enjoy them. The denial of proper burial (a grave insult in ancient understanding) adds another dimension to the nullification; even in death, the unsuccessful person receives no honor.

Ecclesiastes 6:4

The explanation that the stillborn child comes in futility and departs in darkness, with the name covered in darkness, suggests that non-being surpasses a life of unfulfilled potential. The image of darkness and the notion of a name covered (erased) present non-existence as preferable to continued frustration. Yet the very extremity of this comparison (stillborn vs. long-lived) highlights the absurdity of remaining alive while lacking the capacity to enjoy existence.

Ecclesiastes 6:5

The observation that the stillborn has not seen or known the sun, finding more rest than the unsuccessful person, extends the comparison by suggesting that ignorance and unconsciousness provide refuge from the pain of awareness. The stillborn, never awakening to consciousness, never experiences the frustration of potential unfulfilled. This verse intimates that consciousness and knowledge, gifts that Ecclesiastes normally values, can become burdens when accompanied by the inability to find satisfaction.

Ecclesiastes 6:6

The rhetorical question of whether a person living two thousand years without finding satisfaction is any better than one who never enjoys good, returns to the fundamental problem of contentment. The astronomical number (two thousand years) emphasizes that even vastly extended life does not remedy the core problem; a life lacking satisfaction, whether brief or extended, amounts to the same fundamental failure. This verse suggests that the quality of existence—whether one achieves contentment—matters more than duration.

Ecclesiastes 6:7

The statement that all human toil aims at satisfying the mouth, yet the appetite is never satisfied, presents eating and consumption as metaphors for all human striving. The appetite (or soul) drives effort, yet the satisfaction achieved proves temporary; hunger returns. This verse suggests that the structure of human need guarantees that no achievement can permanently satisfy; we are creatures of recurring appetite.

Ecclesiastes 6:8

The question of whether the wise have advantage over the fool, and what advantage the poor have in knowing how to conduct themselves, suggests a limited advantage of wisdom and proper conduct even within the framework of vanity. The phrasing indicates reluctance to grant wisdom any real advantage; it asks what benefit accrues from wisdom when all must die and all attempts at satisfaction fail. Yet the question itself implies that some advantage exists, however slight.

Ecclesiastes 6:10

The observation that whatever exists has already been named, and what a person is has been known, suggests that human identity and destiny are determined rather than open. The statement that humanity cannot contend with someone stronger implies both the futility of struggle against the inevitable and acceptance of human limitation. This verse implies that wrestling against one's nature and circumstances represents a form of vanity; wisdom involves accepting what cannot be changed.

Ecclesiastes 6:11

The note that in many words there is much vanity, and this increases man's futility, returns to the caution about speech introduced in chapter 5. The excessive use of language to describe, argue, and assert proves counterproductive; words multiply without adding real understanding or satisfaction. This verse suggests that silence, or at least restraint in speech, represents a wiser response than endless articulation.

Ecclesiastes 6:12

The final question of who knows what is good for a person in their few days of life, and what will happen after them under the sun, acknowledges the limits of human knowledge and foresight. Qohelet admits that he cannot provide a comprehensive blueprint for living; instead, he recommends modest goods and contentment within uncertainty. This verse consolidates chapter 6's message: faced with the impossibility of achieving permanent satisfaction or understanding life's meaning, wisdom consists in accepting present goods and acknowledging ignorance about the future.