“While it remained unsold, did it not remain your own? And after it was sold, was it not at your disposal? Why is it that you have contrived this deed in your heart? You have not lied to man but to God.””
Didn't it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn't the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to us but to God - Peter's reasoning is brilliant: the property was Ananias's (v. 4a), the sale price was his (v. 4b), but the lying transcends the human transaction entirely. In the Trinity-conscious thought-world of Luke, lying to the apostles about a spiritual gift is lying to God himself (cf. 5:3 and 5:4 used interchangeably). This establishes a functional identification: the apostolic witness mediates God's presence so completely that deception against them is deception against God.
Community Reflections
No reflections on this verse yet
Be the first to write a reflection about this verse.
Acts 5:4
“While it remained unsold, did it not remain your own? And after it was sold, was it not at your disposal? Why is it that you have contrived this deed in your heart? You have not lied to man but to God.””
Didn't it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn't the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to us but to God - Peter's reasoning is brilliant: the property was Ananias's (v. 4a), the sale price was his (v. 4b), but the lying transcends the human transaction entirely. In the Trinity-conscious thought-world of Luke, lying to the apostles about a spiritual gift is lying to God himself (cf. 5:3 and 5:4 used interchangeably). This establishes a functional identification: the apostolic witness mediates God's presence so completely that deception against them is deception against God.
Community Reflections
No reflections on this verse yet
Be the first to write a reflection about this verse.
Didn't it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn't the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to us but to God - Peter's reasoning is brilliant: the property was Ananias's (v. 4a), the sale price was his (v. 4b), but the lying transcends the human transaction entirely. In the Trinity-conscious thought-world of Luke, lying to the apostles about a spiritual gift is lying to God himself (cf. 5:3 and 5:4 used interchangeably). This establishes a functional identification: the apostolic witness mediates God's presence so completely that deception against them is deception against God.