HolyStudy
Bible IndexRead BibleNotesChurchesMissionPrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurchesSign in
HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurches
Sign in

Acts 5

1

But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession,

2

And kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.

3

But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land?

4

Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God.

5

And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things.

1
1
6

And the young men arose, wound him up, and carried him out, and buried him.

7

And it was about the space of three hours after, when his wife, not knowing what was done, came in.

8

And Peter answered unto her, Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much? And she said, Yea, for so much.

9

Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out.

10

Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and, carrying her forth, buried her by her husband.

11

And great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things.

12

And by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the people; (and they were all with one accord in Solomon’s porch.

13

And of the rest durst no man join himself to them: but the people magnified them.

14

And believers were the more added to the Lord, multitudes both of men and women.)

15

Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid them on beds and couches, that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them.

16

There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks, and them which were vexed with unclean spirits: and they were healed every one.

17

Then the high priest rose up, and all they that were with him, (which is the sect of the Sadducees,) and were filled with indignation,

18

And laid their hands on the apostles, and put them in the common prison.

1
19

But the angel of the Lord by night opened the prison doors, and brought them forth, and said,

20

Go, stand and speak in the temple to the people all the words of this life.

1
21

And when they heard that, they entered into the temple early in the morning, and taught. But the high priest came, and they that were with him, and called the council together, and all the senate of the children of Israel, and sent to the prison to have them brought.

22

But when the officers came, and found them not in the prison, they returned, and told,

23

Saying, The prison truly found we shut with all safety, and the keepers standing without before the doors: but when we had opened, we found no man within.

24

Now when the high priest and the captain of the temple and the chief priests heard these things, they doubted of them whereunto this would grow.

25

Then came one and told them, saying, Behold, the men whom ye put in prison are standing in the temple, and teaching the people.

1
26

Then went the captain with the officers, and brought them without violence: for they feared the people, lest they should have been stoned.

27

And when they had brought them, they set them before the council: and the high priest asked them,

28

Saying, Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man’s blood upon us.

29

Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.

30

The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree.

31

Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins.

32

And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.

33

When they heard that, they were cut to the heart, and took counsel to slay them.

34

Then stood there up one in the council, a Pharisee, named Gamaliel, a doctor of the law, had in reputation among all the people, and commanded to put the apostles forth a little space;

35

And said unto them, Ye men of Israel, take heed to yourselves what ye intend to do as touching these men.

36

For before these days rose up Theudas, boasting himself to be somebody; to whom a number of men, about four hundred, joined themselves: who was slain; and all, as many as obeyed him, were scattered, and brought to nought.

37

After this man rose up Judas of Galilee in the days of the taxing, and drew away much people after him: he also perished; and all, even as many as obeyed him, were dispersed.

38

And now I say unto you, Refrain from these men, and let them alone: for if this counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought:

39

But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God.

40

And to him they agreed: and when they had called the apostles, and beaten them, they commanded that they should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go.

41

And they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for his name.

42

And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.

← Previous ChapterNext Chapter →

Acts 5

The story of Ananias and Sapphira represents the Spirit-filled community's first internal crisis: their lie about the sale price of their property is fundamentally a lie against the Holy Spirit (not against apostles or a human system), and their sudden deaths function as the community's visceral recognition that the Spirit is not deceived and that the line between the kingdom and the flesh remains absolute. The apostles continue healing and working wonders, and the Sanhedrin's second wave of arrests and flogging cannot suppress their joy—they rejoice that they were counted worthy to suffer dishonor for the name, inverting worldly values and establishing persecution as a badge of apostolic authenticity. Gamaliel's counsel to the Sanhedrin—if this plan or work is of human origin it will fail, but if it is from God you will not be able to stop these men—introduces a wise voice within Judaism that respects divine providence while doubting the human capacity to discern it. The apostles' refusal to obey the prohibition and their continued preaching in the temple and from house to house establish the pattern that will recur throughout Acts: human opposition cannot silence the Spirit-filled witness.

Acts 5:18

They arrested the apostles and put them in the public jail - the 'public jail' (phylakē dēmosia) was public humiliation as well as imprisonment. The move is bold and escalating; in Acts 4, they arrested Peter and John and released them; now they arrest 'the apostles' collectively, suggesting a move toward systematic suppression.

Acts 5:1

Now a man named Ananias, together with his wife Sapphira, also sold a piece of property - the parallel to Achan is unmistakable, as covenant fidelity now operates under the Spirit rather than under the law. Luke presents a new form of judgment that operates at the threshold of the church's life, where the lying is not about the money but about the Spirit's presence and knowledge. The property sale mirrors the generous pattern of Acts 2:44-45, but corruption enters immediately into the perfect community, showing that the presence of the Spirit does not eliminate human temptation or deception.

Acts 5:2

With his wife's full knowledge he kept back part of the proceeds for himself, but brought the part and laid it at the apostles' feet - the conspiracy is shared, suggesting a common deception rather than isolated weakness. Luke emphasizes that Sapphira is not a victim but a willing participant ('with full knowledge,' suneidotis, sharing complete awareness), establishing joint guilt. The act of laying money at the apostles' feet mimics the righteous behavior of Barnabas (4:36-37), making the deception a mockery of genuine surrender.

Acts 5:3

Then Peter said, 'Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land?' - Peter's diagnostic language ('filled your heart,' plērōsai tēn kardian) echoes the fullness of the Spirit in Acts 2:4, but here inverted as demonic fullness. The lie is specifically 'to the Holy Spirit,' making this not merely fraud against the community but blasphemy against the divine person. Peter's rhetorical question presumes that lying to the Spirit is a category error, a fundamental violation of covenant reality.

Acts 5:4

Didn't it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn't the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied to us but to God - Peter's reasoning is brilliant: the property was Ananias's (v. 4a), the sale price was his (v. 4b), but the lying transcends the human transaction entirely. In the Trinity-conscious thought-world of Luke, lying to the apostles about a spiritual gift is lying to God himself (cf. 5:3 and 5:4 used interchangeably). This establishes a functional identification: the apostolic witness mediates God's presence so completely that deception against them is deception against God.

Acts 5:5

When Ananias heard this, he fell down and died. And great fear seized all who heard what had happened - the judgment is immediate and physical, recalling the curses of Leviticus (cf. Achan in Joshua 7). Luke does not attribute the death explicitly to divine action, but the causation is inescapable: Peter speaks, Ananias dies. The 'great fear' (phobos megas) that seizes the community is the numinous fear of sacred judgment, the fear that belongs to encounter with the holy (cf. Luke 1:12, 2:9).

Acts 5:6

Then some young men came forward, wrapped up his body, and carried it out and buried it - the young men (neōteroi) act as an undertaker guild, handling the unclean task swiftly and without comment. Luke omits Sapphira's knowledge of her husband's death, heightening the dramatic irony when she arrives moments later. The burial is proper and immediate, showing that divine judgment does not deny human dignity, but the speed of the transaction underlines its finality.

Acts 5:7

About three hours later his wife came in, not knowing what had happened - the time gap ('about three hours,' hōsei hōrōn triōn) allows Luke to emphasize that Sapphira has no excuse; she comes without warning, without preparation, meeting the apostles fresh from burying her conspirator. The narrative creates unbearable dramatic tension: she is guilty and ignorant simultaneously.

Acts 5:8

Peter asked her, 'Tell me, is this the price of the land?' 'Yes,' she said, 'that is the price' - Peter's question is a test, giving Sapphira the opportunity to break from the conspiracy and confess. Her affirmation ('Yes, that is the price,' Nai, tosoutou) seals her complicity; she repeats the lie without hesitation. Luke shows no sign of mercy here; she walks into judgment with open eyes, choosing the deception even when given a moment to retreat.

Acts 5:9

Peter said to her, 'How could you conspire to test the Spirit of the Lord? Look! The feet of those who buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out also' - Peter's language ('test the Spirit,' peirazō to pneuma) echoes the wilderness temptation (Matt. 4), suggesting that the sin is not mere fraud but an assault on the Holy Spirit's lordship. The phrase 'Spirit of the Lord' (pneuma kyriou) at this point in Acts carries full trinitarian weight. Peter's announcement of her death before it occurs is prophetic utterance, speaking reality into being.

Acts 5:10

At that very instant she fell down at his feet and died. Then the young men came in and, finding her dead, carried her out and buried her - the parallelism is exact and merciless: Ananias hears judgment and dies; Sapphira hears judgment and dies. The 'very instant' (parachrēma, immediately) shows the causal connection is divine. No apostolic hand strikes; judgment comes through the Spirit itself. Luke's account is remarkably clinical, showing neither satisfaction nor sorrow, only the inexorable reality of lying to God.

Acts 5:11

Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events - the 'great fear' (phobos megas) now extends beyond those present to 'all who heard,' expanding the circle of awe. Luke's use of 'whole church' (holē tē ekklēsia) is significant; this is the first explicit reference to the ekklēsia as a unified entity in Acts. The fear is not terror but reverent awe, the appropriate response to a God who dwells among his people in consuming holiness.

Acts 5:12

The apostles performed many signs and wonders among the people. And all the believers used to meet together in Solomon's Colonnade - the transition from judgment to miracles shows that the church's purity enables its power. 'Many signs and wonders' (sēmeia kai terata) mirrors the language of Jesus's ministry (Luke 4:36, 5:26). Solomon's Colonnade (stoa Solomōntos) was a covered portico on the east side of the temple, a Jewish space where apostolic authority could unfold without immediately provoking Roman concern.

Acts 5:13

No one else dared to join them, even though they were highly regarded by the people - the paradox is deliberate: the apostles enjoy popular esteem ('highly regarded,' megalaunoumenoi) yet people are afraid to join them. The 'fear' that grips the community (5:11) extends to outsiders; the boundary between church and synagogue is hardening, with the apostolic authority creating a sacred separation.

Acts 5:14

Nevertheless, more and more believers were added to the Lord - crowds of both men and women - the 'more and more' (mallon de prosethento) shows growth despite the fear, even because of the fear. The phrase 'added to the Lord' (prosthithēmi tō kyriō) is unique in Acts, emphasizing that growth is not organizational but personal—incorporation into the Lord's body. The explicit mention of women marks a social revolution in a patriarchal context.

Acts 5:15

As a result, people brought the sick into the streets and laid them on beds and mats, that at least Peter's shadow might fall on some of them - the faith-logic here is almost magical, seeking contact with Peter's shadow (skia) as a conduit of healing power. This recalls the woman with the issue of blood touching Jesus's garment (Luke 8:44-48) and suggests that apostolic authority carries a tangible, transferable power. Luke records this without skepticism, implying that divine power can be mediated through proximity.

Acts 5:16

Crowds gathered also from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing their sick and those tormented by unclean spirits, and all of them were healed - the healing ministry extends beyond Jerusalem into the surrounding regions, fulfilling the geographical expansion promised in Acts 1:8. The mention of 'unclean spirits' (pneumata akatharta) alongside physical sickness shows that the apostolic power addresses the totality of human brokenness—body, spirit, and demonic oppression.

Acts 5:17

Then the high priest and all his associates, who were members of the party of the Sadducees, were filled with jealousy - the opposition is now institutional and theological, not spontaneous. The 'party of the Sadducees' (hairesis tōn Saddoukaīōn) were the priestly party who denied resurrection; the apostles' proclamation of Jesus's resurrection strikes at the core of Sadducean theology. The 'jealousy' (zēlos) here has a possessive quality—they jealously guard the temple's spiritual authority.

Acts 5:19

But during the night an angel of the Lord opened the doors of the jail and brought them out - the miraculous deliverance happens 'during the night,' in darkness, suggesting divine action hidden from human sight. The 'angel of the Lord' (angelos kyriou) is a direct emissary of God's will, making the escape a theophanic event. This recalls similar prison deliverances in Jewish tradition (cf. 2 Kings 6:17, 1 Maccabees 2:24).

Acts 5:20

'Go, stand in the temple courts,' he said, 'and tell the people all about this new life' - the angel's command is remarkably specific: stand in the temple itself, the heart of institutional opposition, and proclaim 'this new life' (pantes tas logous tēs zōēs tautēs). The 'new life' (zōē) is not merely regeneration but resurrection life, the inaugurated eschatological reality. The apostles are commanded not to hide but to occupy the center of power.

Acts 5:21

At daybreak they entered the temple courts, as they had been told. When the high priest and his associates arrived, they called together the Sanhedrin - the Sanhedrin (synedrion) is the full council of seventy, the supreme Jewish governing body. The fact that they convene the full council shows the escalating seriousness of the threat the apostles are perceived to pose. Luke emphasizes the apostles' obedience ('as they had been told,' kathos eirēkei) in dramatic counterpoint to the Sanhedrin's reaction.

Acts 5:22

and all the elders of Israel - and sent to the jail for the apostles - the 'elders of Israel' (presbyteroi tou Israēl) extends the assembly beyond the priestly party. The decision to retrieve the apostles from jail is made before anyone realizes they have escaped, showing bureaucratic motion meeting divine action in dramatic irony.

Acts 5:23

When the officers arrived at the jail, they did not find them. So they went back and reported - 'We found the jail securely locked, with the guards standing at the doors; but when we opened them, we found no one inside' - the officers' report is precise and bemused: the security is intact (thyrai kleimenai asphalōs, securely locked) but the prisoners are gone. This is not a security failure but a supernatural escape; Luke emphasizes the locked doors and the stationed guards to make the impossibility clear. The guards themselves remain unexplained and unpunished.

Acts 5:24

On hearing this report, the captain of the temple guard and the chief priests were puzzled, wondering what would come of this - the 'captain of the temple guard' (stratēgos tou hierou) was responsible for the temple police and security. The chief priests' puzzlement (diaporei, bewildered) suggests they are encountering a force outside their administrative categories. Their question 'what will this come to be?' (ti ara touto eseitai) opens to the possibility that even they sense something transcendent.

Acts 5:25

Then someone came and said, 'Look! The men you put in jail are standing in the temple courts teaching the people' - the report is almost comical in its matter-of-factness: the apostles have walked out of jail and straight back to their missionary work. The 'standing in the temple courts' (hestanai en tō hierō) is a position of public proclamation, visible and irrefutable. They are not hiding, repenting, or fleeing; they are continuing their witness.

Acts 5:26

At that, the captain went with his officers and brought the apostles. They did not use force, because they were afraid of the people - the 'fear of the people' (phoboumenoi ton ochlon) reverses the power dynamic. The officers do not lay hands violently but bring them without force (ou meta ias), suggesting a kind of ceremonial arrest. The people's favor is a restraint on institutional power.

Acts 5:27

The apostles were brought in and made to stand before the Sanhedrin. The high priest questioned them - the 'high priest' (archiereus) is the institutional authority, the keeper of the temple and the law. His interrogation of the apostles mirrors Jesus's interrogation before the Sanhedrin (Luke 22:66-71), establishing the apostles as disciples following their Master's path.

Acts 5:28

'We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name,' he said. 'Yet you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and are determined to bring this man's blood guilt on us' - the high priest's accusation reveals the theological crux: the apostles' teaching about Jesus implicates the Sanhedrin in his death. The phrase 'bring this man's blood guilt on us' (epagagein ef' hēmas to haima tou anthrōpou toutou) echoes Matthew 27:25, showing that the Jewish leadership feels the weight of the crucifixion. The 'strict orders' (diesteilato) had been given in Acts 4:18, and they have been defied.

Acts 5:29

Peter and the apostles replied: 'We must obey God rather than human beings!' - the principle is stated with crystalline clarity: divine command supersedes human authority. The phrase 'obey God rather than human beings' (dei obeisai tō theō mallon ē anthrōpois) becomes a foundational assertion for all Christian civil disobedience. Peter speaks for the apostolic body, showing unified conviction and courage.

Acts 5:30

'The God of our fathers raised Jesus from the dead - whom you had killed by hanging him on a pole' - the apostles immediately pivot to resurrection testimony, the core of their message. 'The God of our fathers' (ho theos tōn paterōn hēmōn) grounds the argument in Jewish continuity, but the resurrection breaks all continuity. The 'hanging him on a pole' (kremasante epi xylou) is a scriptural allusion to Deuteronomy 21:23, which curses the hanged; the apostles are declaring that Jesus bore the curse.

Acts 5:31

'God exalted him to his right hand as Prince and Savior that he might bring repentance and forgiveness of sins to Israel' - the 'right hand' (dexia) is the place of divine power and honor (Psalm 110:1). 'Prince and Savior' (archēgos kai sōtēr) are titles of royal and redemptive authority. The purpose of exaltation is missional: 'that he might bring repentance and forgiveness' (didōnai metanoian kai aphesin hamartōn), making the risen Jesus the active agent of Israel's restoration.

Acts 5:32

'We are witnesses of these things, and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him' - the apostles ground their testimony in dual witness: human testimony and the Spirit's testimony. The 'Holy Spirit' (to pneuma to hagion) is given to 'those who obey him' (tois peitharchountsin autō), linking the Spirit's presence to obedience. This is a subtle challenge to the Sanhedrin: if you are not experiencing the Spirit, it is because you are not obeying.

Acts 5:33

When they heard this, they were furious and wanted to put them to death - the 'furious' (dieprionto, gnashing their teeth) reaction is visceral; they are literally cut to the heart by the apostles' boldness. The desire to 'put them to death' (aphenxanto touto anethasanto, wanted to execute them) shows escalation from arrest to capital punishment. The Sanhedrin sees the apostolic testimony as intolerable blasphemy.

Acts 5:34

But a Pharisee named Gamaliel, a teacher of the law, who was honored by all the people, stood up in the Sanhedrin and ordered that the apostles be taken outside for a little while - Gamaliel (ben Gamaliel) was a famous rabbi, a teacher of the law (nomodidaskalos) held in high esteem (timē eichon panto tō laō). His intervention is pragmatic wisdom interrupting religious zealotry. The Pharisees, unlike the Sadducees, believed in resurrection, making Gamaliel theologically less threatened by the apostolic message.

Acts 5:35

'Men of Israel, consider carefully what you intend to do to these men' - Gamaliel's opening is a call to reflection, urging the Sanhedrin to pause before acting. His rhetorical question 'What do you intend to do to these men?' (ti mellousie aphanexai tois anthrōpois toutois) forces deliberation. He is about to reframe the issue as a historical question rather than a theological emergency.

Acts 5:36

'Some time ago Theudas appeared, claiming to be somebody, and about four hundred men rallied to him. He was killed, all his followers were dispersed, and it all came to nothing' - Gamaliel invokes historical precedent: Theudas claimed messianic status and gathered four hundred followers, but was executed and his movement dissolved. This is the first extra-biblical reference to Theudas, a messianic claimant from the late 40s CE. Gamaliel's point is that false messiahs self-destruct.

Acts 5:37

'After him, Judas the Galilean appeared in the days of the census and led a band of people in revolt. He too was killed, and all his followers were scattered' - Judas of Galilee led a revolt around 6 CE in protest against the Roman census; Josephus records this event. Gamaliel is showing a pattern: messianic claimants and their movements are self-limiting. The 'days of the census' (en tais hēmerais tēs apographēs) anchors the event in datable history.

Acts 5:38

'Therefore, in the present case I advise you: Leave these men alone! Let them go! For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail' - Gamaliel's counsel is the voice of prudent restraint: 'Leave these men alone' (aphete tous anthrōpous toutous). His reasoning is elegant: if the apostles' movement is merely human, it will collapse under its own weight, as Theudas and Judas did. Restraint becomes wisdom.

Acts 5:39

'But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God' - this is perhaps the most important theological statement in Acts regarding discernment. Gamaliel articulates the principle that what is 'from God' (ex theou) is unstoppable: 'you will not be able to stop them' (ou dynasthe katalusai autous). The warning 'you will find yourselves fighting against God' (anthestēsesthe tē theō) echoes the Old Testament language of resisting divine purpose (cf. Proverbs 21:30). Gamaliel unknowingly speaks truth prophecy.

Acts 5:40

'His speech persuaded them. They called in the apostles and had them flogged. Then they ordered them not to teach in the name of Jesus and let them go' - Gamaliel's counsel prevails ('persuaded,' epeithon), stopping the Sanhedrin from executing the apostles. However, they compromise by flogging (derantes, beating) and ordering silence. The flogging is a punishment sanctioned by Jewish law (Deuteronomy 25:3), delivered with whips (rhhabdoi). The order 'not to teach in the name of Jesus' reiterates the previous command (4:18).

Acts 5:41

The apostles left the Sanhedrin, rejoicing because they had been counted worthy of suffering disgrace for the Name - the apostles' reaction is extraordinary: they 'rejoice' (chairō) despite flogging. The phrase 'counted worthy of suffering disgrace for the Name' (katēxiōthēsan hyper tou onomatos atimasthenai) connects suffering to honor, disgrace to worthiness. This is eschatological joy, the joy of identifying with Christ's passion (cf. Colossians 1:24, 1 Peter 1:6-7).

Acts 5:42

Day after day, in the temple courts and from house to house, they never stopped teaching and proclaiming the good news that Jesus is the Messiah - the apostles' persistence is absolute: 'day after day' (pasan te hēmeran), 'never stopped' (ouk epauan). The teaching happens in two venues: 'in the temple courts' (en tō hierō, public space) and 'from house to house' (kat' oikon, intimate space). The content remains constant: 'Jesus is the Messiah' (Iēsous ton christon). Obedience to divine command supersedes obedience to human prohibition.