HolyStudy
Bible IndexRead BibleNotesChurchesMissionPrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurchesSign in
HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurches
Sign in

2 Kings 17

1

In the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah began Hoshea the son of Elah to reign in Samaria over Israel nine years.

2

And he did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord, but not as the kings of Israel that were before him.

3

Against him came up Shalmaneser king of Assyria; and Hoshea became his servant, and gave him presents.

4

And the king of Assyria found conspiracy in Hoshea: for he had sent messengers to So king of Egypt, and brought no present to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year: therefore the king of Assyria shut him up, and bound him in prison.

1
5

Then the king of Assyria came up throughout all the land, and went up to Samaria, and besieged it three years.

6

In the ninth year of Hoshea the king of Assyria took Samaria, and carried Israel away into Assyria, and placed them in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes.

7

For so it was, that the children of Israel had sinned against the Lord their God, which had brought them up out of the land of Egypt, from under the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt, and had feared other gods,

8

And walked in the statutes of the heathen, whom the Lord cast out from before the children of Israel, and of the kings of Israel, which they had made.

9

And the children of Israel did secretly those things that were not right against the Lord their God, and they built them high places in all their cities, from the tower of the watchmen to the fenced city.

10

And they set them up images and groves in every high hill, and under every green tree:

1
11

And there they burnt incense in all the high places, as did the heathen whom the Lord carried away before them; and wrought wicked things to provoke the Lord to anger:

12

For they served idols, whereof the Lord had said unto them, Ye shall not do this thing.

13

Yet the Lord testified against Israel, and against Judah, by all the prophets, and by all the seers, saying, Turn ye from your evil ways, and keep my commandments and my statutes, according to all the law which I commanded your fathers, and which I sent to you by my servants the prophets.

14

Notwithstanding they would not hear, but hardened their necks, like to the neck of their fathers, that did not believe in the Lord their God.

15

And they rejected his statutes, and his covenant that he made with their fathers, and his testimonies which he testified against them; and they followed vanity, and became vain, and went after the heathen that were round about them, concerning whom the Lord had charged them, that they should not do like them.

16

And they left all the commandments of the Lord their God, and made them molten images, even two calves, and made a grove, and worshipped all the host of heaven, and served Baal.

17

And they caused their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire, and used divination and enchantments, and sold themselves to do evil in the sight of the Lord, to provoke him to anger.

18

Therefore the Lord was very angry with Israel, and removed them out of his sight: there was none left but the tribe of Judah only.

19

Also Judah kept not the commandments of the Lord their God, but walked in the statutes of Israel which they made.

1
20

And the Lord rejected all the seed of Israel, and afflicted them, and delivered them into the hand of spoilers, until he had cast them out of his sight.

21

For he rent Israel from the house of David; and they made Jeroboam the son of Nebat king: and Jeroboam drave Israel from following the Lord, and made them sin a great sin.

1
22

For the children of Israel walked in all the sins of Jeroboam which he did; they departed not from them;

1
23

Until the Lord removed Israel out of his sight, as he had said by all his servants the prophets. So was Israel carried away out of their own land to Assyria unto this day.

24

And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel: and they possessed Samaria, and dwelt in the cities thereof.

25

And so it was at the beginning of their dwelling there, that they feared not the Lord: therefore the Lord sent lions among them, which slew some of them.

26

Wherefore they spake to the king of Assyria, saying, The nations which thou hast removed, and placed in the cities of Samaria, know not the manner of the God of the land: therefore he hath sent lions among them, and, behold, they slay them, because they know not the manner of the God of the land.

27

Then the king of Assyria commanded, saying, Carry thither one of the priests whom ye brought from thence; and let them go and dwell there, and let him teach them the manner of the God of the land.

28

Then one of the priests whom they had carried away from Samaria came and dwelt in Beth–el, and taught them how they should fear the Lord.

29

Howbeit every nation made gods of their own, and put them in the houses of the high places which the Samaritans had made, every nation in their cities wherein they dwelt.

30

And the men of Babylon made Succoth–benoth, and the men of Cuth made Nergal, and the men of Hamath made Ashima,

31

And the Avites made Nibhaz and Tartak, and the Sepharvites burnt their children in fire to Adrammelech and Anammelech, the gods of Sepharvaim.

32

So they feared the Lord, and made unto themselves of the lowest of them priests of the high places, which sacrificed for them in the houses of the high places.

33

They feared the Lord, and served their own gods, after the manner of the nations whom they carried away from thence.

34

Unto this day they do after the former manners: they fear not the Lord, neither do they after their statutes, or after their ordinances, or after the law and commandment which the Lord commanded the children of Jacob, whom he named Israel;

35

With whom the Lord had made a covenant, and charged them, saying, Ye shall not fear other gods, nor bow yourselves to them, nor serve them, nor sacrifice to them:

36

But the Lord, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt with great power and a stretched out arm, him shall ye fear, and him shall ye worship, and to him shall ye do sacrifice.

37

And the statutes, and the ordinances, and the law, and the commandment, which he wrote for you, ye shall observe to do for evermore; and ye shall not fear other gods.

38

And the covenant that I have made with you ye shall not forget; neither shall ye fear other gods.

39

But the Lord your God ye shall fear; and he shall deliver you out of the hand of all your enemies.

40

Howbeit they did not hearken, but they did after their former manner.

41

So these nations feared the Lord, and served their graven images, both their children, and their children’s children: as did their fathers, so do they unto this day.

← Previous ChapterNext Chapter →

2 Kings 17

The account of the fall of the northern kingdom of Israel to the Assyrian army, the deportation of the Israelite population, and the resettlement of the conquered territory with foreign populations represents the culmination of the apostasy that has characterized the northern kingdom and the vindication of the prophetic judgment pronounced throughout the books of Kings. The chapter opens with a summary of the reasons for Israel's fall: the Israelites had sinned against YHWH their God who had brought them up from the land of Egypt. The text provides a comprehensive list of transgressions and notes that YHWH had sent prophets and seers to warn Israel and Judah. The chapter describes the Assyrian campaign and the conquest of Samaria after a three-year siege; the text notes that the Assyrians deported the Israelites, removing the northern population from their homeland and replacing them with populations from other regions. The theological interpretation provided by the biblical text is comprehensive. The chapter concludes with an account of the peoples brought in to settle the land of Israel and their mixed religious practices. The theological significance lies in the vindication of the prophetic word pronounced throughout the narrative.

2 Kings 17:12

They served idols, of which the LORD had said to them, 'You shall not do this thing' — the phrase "They served idols" (וַיַּעַבְדוּ אֶת־הַגִּלֻּלִים, *way-ya'avdu et-ha-gillulim*, where *gillulim* is a contemptuous term meaning "dungheap idols") emphasizes the degradation of worship. The reminder that the LORD explicitly commanded against idolatry ("of which the LORD had said to them, 'You shall not do this thing'") underscores Israel's defiance: this was not ignorance but willful violation of an explicit divine prohibition.

2 Kings 17:1

In the twelfth year of King Ahaz of Judah, Hoshea son of Elah began to reign over Israel in Samaria, and reigned nine years — Hoshea's accession, synchronized with Ahaz's twelfth year, marks the beginning of the end for the northern kingdom. Hoshea (הוֹשֵׁעַ, *Hoshea*), Israel's final king, inherits a kingdom already under Assyrian vassalage and facing territorial loss. His nine-year reign spans the final period before Samaria's fall, representing the ultimate weakness of northern kingship. The synchronism with Ahaz's reign indicates that Judah's great reformer Hezekiah will emerge precisely as Israel collapses.

2 Kings 17:2

He did what was evil in the sight of the LORD, yet not like the kings of Israel who were before him — Hoshea perpetuates the apostasy formula, yet the qualification—"not like the kings of Israel who were before him"—offers a subtle distinction suggesting relative moderation. The qualification appears mysterious given that all northern kings are condemned identically, yet it may suggest Hoshea's recognition of vassalage and diminished ability to pursue independent apostasy. This subtle distinction, appearing only for Hoshea among northern kings, perhaps indicates awareness of his inferior status: he is not free enough to perpetuate apostasy as aggressively as his predecessors.

2 Kings 17:3

King Shalmaneser of Assyria came up against him; and Hoshea became his vassal, and paid him tribute — Shalmaneser V, inheritor of Tiglath-Pileser's imperial dominion, initiates the final siege against Israel. Hoshea's submission—"became his vassal" (וַיִּשְׁמַר לוֹ עֶבֶד, *way-yishmar lo eved*)—indicates acknowledgment of subordination and tributary obligation. The payment of tribute (מִנְחָה, *minchah*) represents the ongoing exaction that depletes the northern kingdom's resources. This vassalage relationship, following decades of Assyrian dominion, demonstrates Israel's complete political subordination.

2 Kings 17:4

But the king of Assyria found treachery in Hoshea; for he had sent envoys to King So of Egypt, and brought no tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year. Therefore the king of Assyria confined him and imprisoned him — Hoshea's attempt to forge an alliance with Egypt (presumably through King So, possibly Osorkon IV) while withholding tribute from Assyria represents a desperate gambit for independence. The failure of this strategy is immediate: Shalmaneser detects the treachery and imprisons Hoshea. The imprisonment (וַיַּצַּר אוֹתוֹ וַיִּשְׁמְרֵהוּ בַּבַּיִת, *way-yatzar oto way-yishmerhu ba-bayit*) places the last northern king in captivity. Hoshea's failed rebellion precipitates the final Assyrian response: the siege of Samaria.

2 Kings 17:5

Then the king of Assyria invaded all the land, and came to Samaria, and besieged it three years — Shalmaneser's invasion and three-year siege of Samaria (צַר עַל־שׁוֹמְרוֹן שָׁלוֹשׁ שָׁנִים, *tzar al-Shomron shalosh shanim*) represents the culmination of Assyrian expansionism and Israel's complete subjugation. The three-year duration indicates Jerusalem's walls' strength comparable to Samaria's: even the Assyrian machine requires sustained siege to breach fortifications. Yet Samaria's ultimate fall is assured; the three-year siege merely postpones the inevitable. This protracted siege demonstrates both Samaria's defenses and Assyria's inexorable will to conquest.

2 Kings 17:6

In the ninth year of Hoshea, the king of Assyria captured Samaria, and deported Israel to Assyria, and settled them in Halah, and on the Habor, the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes — Samaria's capture (לָכַד אֶת־שׁוֹמְרוֹן, *lakad et-Shomron*) in Hoshea's ninth year marks the end of the northern kingdom (722 BCE). The phrase "deported Israel to Assyria" (וַיִּגְלוּ אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵל אַשּׁוּר, *way-yiglu et-Yisrael Ashur*) indicates mass population transfer, the Assyrian imperial policy designed to prevent rebellion by dispersing conquered populations. The geographic notation—Halah (חָלַח, *Chalach*), Habor (חָבוֹר, *Chavur*), Gozan (גוֹזָן, *Gozan*), cities of the Medes (עָרֵי מָדַי, *arei Maday*)—indicates locations throughout Mesopotamia and beyond, distances from Israel ensuring no return. This deportation, commemorated throughout subsequent Jewish memory as the "exile of the ten tribes," represents Israel's dissolution as a political entity.

2 Kings 17:7

This occurred because the people of Israel had sinned against the LORD their God, who had brought them up out of the land of Egypt from under the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt — the beginning of the theological explanation for exile: Israel's sin against the LORD. The phrase "sinned against the LORD their God" (חָטְאוּ לַיהוָה אֱלֹהֵיהֶם, *chotau la-YHWH Elohehem*) invokes the covenant relationship: Israel is the LORD's people, brought out of Egypt through divine intervention. This foundational act of deliverance—the Exodus (יָצָא מִמִּצְרַיִם, *yatza mi-Mitzrayim*)—establishes the basis for covenant obligation. Israel's exile represents not merely military defeat but covenant violation, the breaking of the relationship initiated by the Exodus.

2 Kings 17:8

and had walked in the customs of the nations whom the LORD drove out before the people of Israel, and of the kings of Israel which they had made — Israel's sin specifically consists of "walking in the customs of the nations" (בְחֻקּוֹת הַגּוֹיִם, *be-chukkot ha-goim*) that the LORD previously destroyed to make room for Israel's settlement. The irony is profound: Israel adopts the very practices that precipitated previous nations' destruction. The phrase "of the kings of Israel which they had made" indicates that kingship itself, and the kings' cultic choices, led Israel into apostasy. This theological interpretation suggests that Israel's political system, modeled on and inheriting the northern kingdom's dynasties, institutionalized apostasy.

2 Kings 17:9

The people of Israel secretly did things that were not right against the LORD their God. They built for themselves high places in all their towns, from watchtower to fortified city — Israel's apostasy was pervasive and institutionalized: high places (בָּמוֹת, *bamot*) existed in every settlement "from watchtower to fortified city," encompassing both small rural shrines and major urban centers. The phrase "secretly did things that were not right" (וַיִּבְנוּ לָהֶם בָּמוֹת, *way-yivnu lahem bamot*) suggests deliberate concealment or implicit understanding that these practices violated the covenant. The comprehensive nature of the high places—in all towns—indicates systematic institutional apostasy, not occasional lapses.

2 Kings 17:10

They set up for themselves pillars and sacred poles on every high hill and under every green tree — the physical apparatus of Canaanite worship—pillars (מַצֵּבוֹת, *matzebot*, stone monuments to deities) and sacred poles (אֲשֵׁרִים, *asherim*, wooden representations of the goddess Asherah)—became ubiquitous throughout Israel. The phrase "on every high hill and under every green tree" indicates landscape-embedded idolatry: worship locations were dispersed throughout the geography rather than centralized in the temple. This landscape-based religious transformation represents the complete supplanting of Yahweh-worship by Canaanite fertility cults.

2 Kings 17:11

There they made offerings on all the high places, as the nations did whom the LORD had carried away before them. They did wicked things, provoking the LORD to anger — Israel's sacrificial practices on high places mirrored those of the nations previously displaced by the LORD. The phrase "the nations did whom the LORD had carried away" (אֲשֶׁר־גָּלָה יְהוָה לִפְנֵיהֶם, *asher galah YHWH lifnehem*, literally "whom the LORD had exiled before them") invokes the Canaanite displacement: the LORD removed nations to make room for Israel, yet Israel adopted those very nations' practices. The theological tragedy is complete: Israel becomes a replica of the nations it displaced, inviting the same judgment—exile—that befell them.

2 Kings 17:13

Yet the LORD warned Israel and Judah by every prophet and every seer, saying, 'Turn from your evil ways and keep my commandments and my statutes, in accordance with all the law that I commanded your ancestors, and that I sent to you by my servants the prophets' — the theological explanation emphasizes the LORD's patience: prophetic warnings (בְכָל־נְבִיאָיו וּבְכָל־הַרֹאִים, *be-khol-nevi'av u-be-khol-ha-roim*) were sent repeatedly to Israel and Judah, offering opportunities for repentance. The prophetic message emphasized return to covenant law and obedience to divine commandments. This verse establishes the theodicy: exile is not arbitrary punishment but the consequence of systematic rejection of divine warnings delivered through the prophetic succession.

2 Kings 17:14

But they would not listen, but were stubborn, like their ancestors who did not believe in the LORD their God — Israel's fundamental sin was refusal to listen (לֹא שָׁמְעוּ, *lo shamu*), a stubborn resistance that characterized not merely one generation but ancestral inheritance. The phrase "stubborn, like their ancestors who did not believe in the LORD their God" (וַיִּקְשׁוּ אֶת־עׇרְפָּם כְּאָבוֹתָם, *way-yiqshu et-orfam ke-avotam*) invokes the persistent rebellion that characterized Israel from the wilderness wandering through the conquest. "Stiffening the neck" (הִקְשׁוּ עֹרֶף, *hikashu oref*) was Israel's characteristic rebellion against divine guidance.

2 Kings 17:15

They rejected his statutes, and his covenant that he had made with their ancestors, and the warnings that he gave them. They went after false idols and became false, and they imitated the nations that were around them, concerning whom the LORD had commanded them, 'You shall not do as they do' — Israel's sin is comprehensively catalogued: rejection of statutes (חֻקֹּתָיו, *chukkotav*), rejection of covenant (בְּרִיתוֹ, *berito*), rejection of prophetic warnings, and active adoption of foreign idolatry. The phrase "they imitated the nations that were around them" (וַיֵּלְכוּ אַחֲרֵי הַגּוֹיִם, *way-yelkhu achare ha-goim*) indicates deliberate choice: Israel adopted the religious practices of surrounding peoples despite explicit divine prohibition. The theological irony deepens: the LORD warned "You shall not do as they do," yet Israel did precisely that.

2 Kings 17:16

They abandoned all the commandments of the LORD their God, and made for themselves cast images of two calves; they made a sacred pole, worshiped all the host of heaven, and served Baal — the theological indictment reaches its climax: Israel abandoned all divine commandments (עָזַב אֶת־כָּל־מִצְוֹת, *azav et-kol-mitzvot*) and pursued a comprehensive pantheon of false deities. The cast images of two calves (עֵגְלֵי מַסֵּכָה, *eglei masekah*) reference Jeroboam I's golden calves at Bethel and Dan, the foundational apostasy of the northern kingdom. The reference to serving Baal (עַבַד אֶת־הַבַּעַל, *abad et-ha-Ba'al*) indicates Phoenician fertility-god worship. The phrase "worshiped all the host of heaven" (וַיִּשְׁתַּחֲווּ לְכָל־צְבָא הַשָּׁמַיִם, *way-yishtachavu le-khol-tzva ha-shamayim*) indicates astral deities, Mesopotamian religious practice. This comprehensive apostasy—calves, sacred poles, Baal, astral deities—represents the complete displacement of Yahweh-worship by a syncretic pantheon.

2 Kings 17:17

They made their sons and daughters pass through the fire; they used divination and omens; and they sold themselves to do what was evil in the sight of the LORD, provoking him to anger — child sacrifice (הֶעֱבִיר אֶת־בְנֵיהֶם וְאֶת־בְנוֹתֵיהֶם בָּאֵשׁ, *he'evir et-bnehem ve-et-bnotam ba-esh*) was practiced at the national level, not merely by individual kings like Ahaz. Divination and omens (נִחֲשׁוּ וַיִּנְחֲשׁוּ, *nichashu va-yinchashu*) indicate reliance on forbidden magical practices rather than divine revelation. The phrase "they sold themselves to do what was evil" (וַיִּמְכְּרוּ אֶת־עַצְמָם לַעֲשׂוֹת הָרַע, *way-yimkru et-atzmehem la-asot ha-ra*) invokes the language of slave-selling: Israel sold its freedom to pursue evil. This comprehensive apostasy at every level—child sacrifice, divination, and deliberate evil—constitutes the complete spiritual dissolution of the nation.

2 Kings 17:18

Therefore the LORD was very angry with Israel and removed them out of his sight. None was left but the tribe of Judah alone — the divine response is swift and total: "the LORD was very angry with Israel" (וַיִּתְאַנַּף יְהוָה מְאֹד בְיִשְׂרָאֵל, *way-yit'annaf YHWH me'od be-Yisrael*) and "removed them out of his sight" (וַיִּשְׁלֵם מֵעַל־פָּנָיו, *way-yishlum me-al-panav*). The phrase "removed them out of his sight" (הֶסִּיר אוֹתוֹ מֵעַל־פָּנָיו, *hessir oto me-al-panav*) invokes the language of covenant rupture: Israel is no longer the LORD's people, removed from divine presence. The note "None was left but the tribe of Judah alone" establishes the theological hinge: Israel's exile is total, yet Judah—the southern kingdom—remains, preserving the possibility of covenant continuation through the Davidic line.

2 Kings 17:19

Judah also did not keep the commandments of the LORD their God but walked in the customs that Israel had done — the verse clarifies that Judah's spiritual condition is similarly compromised: Judah also failed to keep divine commandments and adopted Israel's practices. Yet Judah's case is distinguished in verse 18: despite equal apostasy, Judah is not deported but retained. This theological asymmetry—Judah survives despite equal apostasy—suggests that the Davidic covenant provides Judah with a reprieve unavailable to Israel. The northern kingdom, built on schismatic rejection of the Davidic promise, lacks this covenantal reserve.

2 Kings 17:20

The LORD rejected all the offspring of Israel and afflicted them, and gave them into the hand of plunderers, until he had cast them out of his sight — the phrase "rejected all the offspring of Israel" (וַיִּמְאַס יְהוָה בְכָל־זֶרַע יִשְׂרָאֵל, *way-yim'as YHWH be-khol-zera Yisrael*) invokes the language of ultimate rejection: Israel is no longer recognized as the LORD's chosen people. The "plunderers" (וְיִתְּנוּם בְיַד־שׁוֹסְלִים, *ve-yitnuм be-yad-shoslim*) reference Assyrian forces. The final phrase "cast them out of his sight" repeats verse 18's language, emphasizing the totality of Israel's rejection.

2 Kings 17:30

The people of Babylon made Succoth Benoth; the people of Cuthah made Nergal; the people of Hamath made Ashima — the detailed enumeration of foreign gods—Succoth Benoth, Nergal, Ashima—indicates that each population group brought its national deities with them. These gods, placed in Samarian high places, represent the syncretic religious landscape that emerged from the population transfer. Nergal (the Mesopotamian god of plague and the underworld) is particularly notable given the lion attacks just described.

2 Kings 17:21

For when he tore Israel away from the house of David, they made Jeroboam son of Nebat king. And Jeroboam drove Israel away from following the LORD and made them commit great sin — the theological explanation for Israel's fall traces back to the schism: when Israel separated from the Davidic house (the kingdom split in 1 Kings 12), it appointed Jeroboam (יָרָבְעָם, *Yarav'am*) as king. Jeroboam's act—"drove Israel away from following the LORD" (וַיִּדְּחֵק אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵל אַחֲרֵי הַבְּעָלִים, *way-yiddchek et-Yisrael achare ha-Ba'alim*)—establishes the institutional apostasy. This theological interpretation of the schism as rebellion against the Davidic covenant becomes the paradigm: Israel's fall traces to Jeroboam's rebellion, perpetuated by his successors.

2 Kings 17:22

So the people of Israel persisted in all the sins of Jeroboam which he had committed; they did not depart from them — the phrase "persisted in all the sins of Jeroboam" (וַיִּשְׁמְרוּ בְכָל־חַטֹּאוֹת יָרָבְעָם, *way-yishmeru be-khol-chattot Yarav'am*) indicates not merely continuity but active preservation of Jeroboam's apostasy. The institutional apostasy, once established, became embedded in the northern kingdom's religious DNA, perpetuated through successive generations despite prophetic warnings. The sins of Jeroboam I (the calves, the high places) were institutionalized at such depth that no subsequent king could escape them.

2 Kings 17:23

until the LORD removed Israel out of his sight, as he had spoken by all his servants the prophets. So Israel was exiled from their own land to Assyria until this day — Israel's exile is attributed to the LORD's action (הִשְׁלִיךְ אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵל, *hishshlich et-Yisrael*), executed "as he had spoken by all his servants the prophets." The prophetic warnings, catalogued in verses 13-14, are now fulfilled: exile is the consequence of rejecting the prophetic summons to repentance. The phrase "until this day" (עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה, *ad ha-yom ha-zeh*) indicates the narrator's perspective from a later period, witnessing Israel's continued exile. The deportation (גָּלוּ, *galu*) is complete and apparently permanent.

2 Kings 17:24

The king of Assyria brought people from Babylon, Cuthah, Avva, Hamath, and Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the people of Israel; they took possession of Samaria and settled in its cities — Shalmaneser's replacement of deported Israelites with peoples from throughout his empire (Babylon, Cuthah, Avva, Hamath, Sepharvaim) represents the Assyrian imperial policy of population transfer and cultural erasure. The diverse origins of the replacement populations—each city with its own gods and religious practices—ensured that no unified national consciousness could develop in Samaria. This systematic cultural displacement was designed to prevent rebellion through the destruction of local identity and the creation of composite societies without shared loyalty.

2 Kings 17:25

When they first settled there, they did not worship the LORD; therefore the LORD sent lions among them, which killed some of them — the imported populations' failure to "worship the LORD" (וְלֹא יָרְאוּ אֶת־יְהוָה, *ve-lo yaru et-YHWH*) provokes divine judgment through lions (אֲרָיוֹת, *arayot*). The lion attacks suggest that the land itself—now empty of Yahweh-worshipers—was reclaimed by wild beasts. Theologically, the plague of lions indicates the LORD's ownership of the land: even depopulated and repopulated with foreign peoples, the land remains the LORD's domain, and violation of its religious requirements brings judgment. The lion attacks killed "some of them," suggesting an ongoing threat rather than immediate total destruction.

2 Kings 17:26

So the king of Assyria was told, 'The people whom you have deported and placed in the cities of Samaria do not know the law of the god of the land; therefore he has sent lions among them; they are killing them, because they do not know the law of the god of the land' — the interpretation of the lion attacks is remarkable: they result from the people's failure to worship "the god of the land" (אֱלֹהֵי הָאָרֶץ, *Elohei ha-aretz*). This conceptualization—that the land itself has a deity whose worship is required—reflects both Yahwist theology (the land belongs to the LORD) and ancient Near Eastern geographical religion (each land has its patron deity). The failure to observe this land's religious requirements brings divine punishment. This theological interpretation of the lion attacks as punishment for failing to worship the land's deity suggests that the replacement populations understood their plight in religious terms.

2 Kings 17:27

Then the king of Assyria commanded, 'Send there one of the priests whom you exiled from there; let him go and live there, and teach them the law of the god of the land' — Shalmaneser's response is pragmatic: he orders the Assyrian administration to bring back one of the priests exiled from Samaria to teach the imported peoples "the law of the god of the land." This represents a striking compromise: Assyrian imperial administration, seeking to eliminate rebellion and stabilize the region, sanctioned the religious instruction of replacement populations in Yahwism. The priest is instructed to teach the "law" (תּוֹרַת, *torat*) of the god of the land, suggesting instruction in cultic requirements and practices necessary to avoid divine punishment.

2 Kings 17:28

So one of the priests whom they had exiled from Samaria came and lived in Bethel, and taught them how they should worship the LORD — a priest returns to Bethel (the cultic center of the northern kingdom, site of Jeroboam's golden calf) to teach the replacement populations Yahwistic worship. The phrase "taught them how they should worship the LORD" suggests cultic instruction focused on maintaining proper relationship with the land's deity. Bethel, once a center of schismatic worship (Jeroboam's calf), becomes the pedagogical center for Yahwistic instruction of the foreign populations.

2 Kings 17:29

But every nation still made gods of its own and put them in the shrines of the high places that the Samaria had made; every nation in the cities in which they lived — despite the priest's instruction, the replacement populations continued manufacturing their own gods (אֱלֹהִים, *Elohim*) and placing them in the high places established by the Israelites. The phrase "every nation still made gods of its own" indicates each population group maintained its own religious identity while nominally adopting Yahwistic worship. This represents the syncretism that characterizes the later Samaritan community: a blended religious identity combining Yahwism with foreign deities.

2 Kings 17:31

the Avvites made Nibhaz and Tartak; and the Sepharvites burned their children in the fire to Sargon and Anammelech — the Sepharvites' practice of burning children (וַיְשׂרְפוּ אֶת־בְנֵיהֶם בָּאֵשׁ, *vay-srafу et-bnehem ba-esh*) to their deities Sargon and Anammelech represents the continuation of child-sacrifice practices into the syncretic Samaritan religious system. This horrifying detail—child sacrifice practiced by replacement populations in the depopulated land—demonstrates how thoroughly non-Yahwistic religious practices persisted despite the priest's instruction.

2 Kings 17:32

So they worshipped the LORD but also served their own gods, in accordance with the customs of the nations from which they had been brought — the summary verse clarifies the syncretic outcome: the replacement populations "worshipped the LORD" (וַיִּהְיוּ יְרֵאִים אֶת־יְהוָה, *vay-yihyu yerei'im et-YHWH*) out of fear of the land's divine retribution, yet they "also served their own gods" (וְאֶת־אֱלֹהֵיהֶם הָיוּ עֹבְדִים, *ve-et-Elohehem hayu oveдim*) according to their ancestral customs. This compromise—fear-based Yahwism coupled with ancestral polytheism—defines the religious identity of the replacement populations and later the Samaritan community. The theological irony is profound: forced to worship the land's deity (the LORD) to avoid divine punishment, the foreign populations created a syncretized religion fundamentally compromised.

2 Kings 17:33

They feared the LORD but also served their own gods and their children and their children's grandchildren continue to do the same to this day — the final verse on the syncretic Samaritan religion indicates its persistence through generations: the fear-based Yahwism coupled with polytheism became institutionalized, perpetuated through "their children and their children's grandchildren." The phrase "to this day" suggests the narrator's perspective from centuries later (likely exilic or post-exilic times), observing that the syncretic religious compromise established through forced population transfer and priestly instruction persisted indefinitely. The Samaritan religion, from this perspective, represents a corrupted form of Yahwism, neither authentic Judahite monotheism nor purely foreign polytheism.

2 Kings 17:34

To this day they continue in their former practices. They do not worship the LORD, and they do not follow the statutes or the ordinances or the law or the commandment that the LORD commanded the children of Jacob, whom he named Israel — the theological evaluation of the Samaritan syncretism is unambiguous: they "do not worship the LORD" (לֹא־יִשְׁמְרוּ אֶת־הַחֻקִּים, *lo-yishmeru et-ha-chukim*) and they "do not follow the statutes or the ordinances or the law or the commandment that the LORD commanded." The specific reference to "Jacob, whom he named Israel" invokes the patriarchal covenant and the promise of the land. The Samaria population's failure to keep covenant law represents their exclusion from the covenant relationship. This verse establishes the theological basis for later Judean rejection of the Samaritans: they represent a compromised, syncretic form of Yahwism without genuine covenant obedience.

2 Kings 17:35

The LORD had made a covenant with them and commanded them, 'You shall not worship other gods or bow down to them or serve them or sacrifice to them' — the restatement of the covenant prohibition against polytheism and idol worship emphasizes the clarity of divine command. The LORD's covenant explicitly forbade the very practices the Samaritan syncretism embraced. The multiple prohibitions—"not worship other gods... not bow down to them... not serve them... not sacrifice to them"—indicate the thoroughness of the command and the completeness of Samaritan violation.

2 Kings 17:36

But you shall worship the LORD your God and by him alone shall you swear oaths. You shall bow down to him and to him alone shall you sacrifice — the positive statement of the covenant command invokes exclusive devotion to the LORD. The phrase "by him alone shall you swear oaths" (וּבוֹ תִשָּׁמְרוּ, *u-vo tishmaru*, or variant "by him alone you shall swear") indicates that covenant loyalty requires absolute commitment and oath-taking exclusively by the LORD's name. The triple prohibition against bowing, serving, or sacrificing to other gods followed by the triple positive injunction—worship, swear by, bow to—establishes the totality of covenant requirement. Syncretism is fundamentally incompatible with covenant obedience.

2 Kings 17:37

and the statutes and the ordinances and the law and the commandment that he wrote for you, you shall always be careful to observe. You shall not worship other gods — the covenant requirement extends beyond cultic exclusivity to comprehensive obedience to law and commandment. The phrase "the statutes and the ordinances and the law and the commandment that he wrote for you" invokes the comprehensive nature of Torah obligation. The final restatement—"You shall not worship other gods"—returns to the foundational prohibition, emphasizing its centrality.

2 Kings 17:38

You shall not forget the covenant that I have made with you. You shall not worship other gods — the covenant memory itself becomes a theological obligation: Israel is commanded not to "forget the covenant" (לֹא־תִשְׁכְּחוּ אֶת־הַבְּרִית, *lo-tishkechu et-ha-berit*). The covenant relationship is not merely legal obligation but remembrance-based relationship. The phrase "the covenant that I have made with you" invokes the personal, relational character of the covenant. Yet Israel and the replacement populations alike violated this covenantal memory and obligation.

2 Kings 17:39

but you shall worship the LORD your God; then he will deliver you out of the hand of all your enemies — the conditional promise: exclusive worship of the LORD ensures deliverance from enemies. This promise, stated at the end of the exile explanation, serves as the counterpoint to the exile itself: had Israel maintained exclusive Yahwistic devotion, it would have been delivered from Assyrian conquest. The promise remains available theoretically, yet the historical narrative has already demonstrated Israel's permanent exile.

2 Kings 17:40

However, they would not listen but continued to practice their former customs — the final judgment on both Israel and the replacement Samaritan populations: they "would not listen" (לֹא שָׁמְעוּ, *lo shamu*) but continued in apostasy. The phrase "continued to practice their former customs" indicates stubborn persistence in rebellion despite covenant warnings and conditions. This verse completes the cycle: warnings offered (v. 13), refusal to listen (v. 14), comprehensive apostasy (v. 16), exile (v. 23), replacement populations taught the covenant (v. 28), yet syncretism persists (v. 40).

2 Kings 17:41

So these nations worshipped the LORD but also served their carved images, to this day. Their children and their children's children continue to do as their ancestors did — the final summary indicates that the syncretic Samaritan religion, neither authentic Yahwism nor purely pagan, persisted through generations. The repeated phrase "their carved images" (פְסִילֵיהֶם, *pesileihem*) indicates that polytheistic idolatry remained institutionalized within the Samaritan community. The phrase "to this day" suggests a perspective centuries after the exile, observing the persistence of Samaritan syncretism. This theological evaluation of Samaritan religion establishes the framework for later Judean-Samaritan antagonism: the Samaritans represent a fundamentally compromised form of Yahwism, rejecting exclusive covenant devotion and embracing the polytheistic practices that led to Israel's destruction.