HolyStudy
Bible IndexRead BibleNotesChurchesMissionPrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurchesSign in
HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurches
Sign in

1 Kings 16

1

Then the word of the Lord came to Jehu the son of Hanani against Baasha, saying,

1
2

Forasmuch as I exalted thee out of the dust, and made thee prince over my people Israel; and thou hast walked in the way of Jeroboam, and hast made my people Israel to sin, to provoke me to anger with their sins;

1
3

Behold, I will take away the posterity of Baasha, and the posterity of his house; and will make thy house like the house of Jeroboam the son of Nebat.

4

Him that dieth of Baasha in the city shall the dogs eat; and him that dieth of his in the fields shall the fowls of the air eat.

5

Now the rest of the acts of Baasha, and what he did, and his might, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?

1
6

So Baasha slept with his fathers, and was buried in Tirzah: and Elah his son reigned in his stead.

1
7

And also by the hand of the prophet Jehu the son of Hanani came the word of the Lord against Baasha, and against his house, even for all the evil that he did in the sight of the Lord, in provoking him to anger with the work of his hands, in being like the house of Jeroboam; and because he killed him.

8

In the twenty and sixth year of Asa king of Judah began Elah the son of Baasha to reign over Israel in Tirzah, two years.

9

And his servant Zimri, captain of half his chariots, conspired against him, as he was in Tirzah, drinking himself drunk in the house of Arza steward of his house in Tirzah.

10

And Zimri went in and smote him, and killed him, in the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah, and reigned in his stead.

11

And it came to pass, when he began to reign, as soon as he sat on his throne, that he slew all the house of Baasha: he left him not one that pisseth against a wall, neither of his kinsfolks, nor of his friends.

12

Thus did Zimri destroy all the house of Baasha, according to the word of the Lord, which he spake against Baasha by Jehu the prophet,

1
13

For all the sins of Baasha, and the sins of Elah his son, by which they sinned, and by which they made Israel to sin, in provoking the Lord God of Israel to anger with their vanities.

14

Now the rest of the acts of Elah, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?

15

In the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah did Zimri reign seven days in Tirzah. And the people were encamped against Gibbethon, which belonged to the Philistines.

1
16

And the people that were encamped heard say, Zimri hath conspired, and hath also slain the king: wherefore all Israel made Omri, the captain of the host, king over Israel that day in the camp.

17

And Omri went up from Gibbethon, and all Israel with him, and they besieged Tirzah.

18

And it came to pass, when Zimri saw that the city was taken, that he went into the palace of the king’s house, and burnt the king’s house over him with fire, and died,

19

For his sins which he sinned in doing evil in the sight of the Lord, in walking in the way of Jeroboam, and in his sin which he did, to make Israel to sin.

20

Now the rest of the acts of Zimri, and his treason that he wrought, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?

21

Then were the people of Israel divided into two parts: half of the people followed Tibni the son of Ginath, to make him king; and half followed Omri.

22

But the people that followed Omri prevailed against the people that followed Tibni the son of Ginath: so Tibni died, and Omri reigned.

1
23

In the thirty and first year of Asa king of Judah began Omri to reign over Israel, twelve years: six years reigned he in Tirzah.

24

And he bought the hill Samaria of Shemer for two talents of silver, and built on the hill, and called the name of the city which he built, after the name of Shemer, owner of the hill, Samaria.

25

But Omri wrought evil in the eyes of the Lord, and did worse than all that were before him.

26

For he walked in all the way of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, and in his sin wherewith he made Israel to sin, to provoke the Lord God of Israel to anger with their vanities.

27

Now the rest of the acts of Omri which he did, and his might that he shewed, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel?

28

So Omri slept with his fathers, and was buried in Samaria: and Ahab his son reigned in his stead.

29

And in the thirty and eighth year of Asa king of Judah began Ahab the son of Omri to reign over Israel: and Ahab the son of Omri reigned over Israel in Samaria twenty and two years.

30

And Ahab the son of Omri did evil in the sight of the Lord above all that were before him.

31

And it came to pass, as if it had been a light thing for him to walk in the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, that he took to wife Jezebel the daughter of Ethbaal king of the Zidonians, and went and served Baal, and worshipped him.

32

And he reared up an altar for Baal in the house of Baal, which he had built in Samaria.

33

And Ahab made a grove; and Ahab did more to provoke the Lord God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel that were before him.

34

In his days did Hiel the Beth–elite build Jericho: he laid the foundation thereof in Abiram his firstborn, and set up the gates thereof in his youngest son Segub, according to the word of the Lord, which he spake by Joshua the son of Nun.

← Previous ChapterNext Chapter →

1 Kings 16

The account of the establishment of Omri's dynasty in Israel and the rise of Ahab, Omri's son, as king represents a new phase in the northern kingdom's history, one characterized by increasing political power and military sophistication coupled with deepening apostasy and the worship of the Phoenician god Baal. The chapter details the civil war in Israel following Elah's assassination by Zimri: Zimri seizes the throne but is quickly besieged by Omri, who leads the army, and Zimri commits suicide rather than surrender. Omri is then confirmed as king and moves the capital from Tirzah to Samaria, establishing a new administrative and political center. The chapter notes that 'Omri did what was evil in the sight of YHWH, and did more evil than all who were before him.' Ahab, Omri's son, continues his father's evil ways and 'did more to provoke the anger of YHWH, the God of Israel, than all the kings of Israel who were before him.' The chapter details Ahab's marriage to Jezebel, daughter of the king of the Sidonians, an alliance that brings Jezebel and her entourage of Baal-worshippers into the political and religious heart of Israel. The theological significance lies in the recognition that the northern kingdom's political organization comes at the cost of deepening apostasy.

1 Kings 16:9

And his servant Zimri, captain of half his chariots, conspired against him. And Elah was in Tirzah, drinking himself drunk in the house of Arza steward of his house in Tirzah — Zimri assassinates Elah while the king is intoxicated during a feast. The phrase shows catastrophic leadership failure: Elah's drunkenness (שִׁכּוֹר) renders him vulnerable to his own officer's treachery. The dereliction of judgment recalls Solomon's warnings about wine (Prov 20:1); weakness invites conspiracy.

1 Kings 16:1

Then the word of the LORD came to Jehu the son of Hanani against Baasha, saying — The prophet Jehu brings divine judgment against Baasha. The phrase marks God's intervention through prophetic word, establishing the pattern that no apostate dynasty escapes divine scrutiny. Jehu (יהוא) means 'Yah is He,' emphasizing divine presence in the verdict. This echoes the prophetic pattern established through Samuel and Elijah.

1 Kings 16:2

Forasmuch as I exalted thee out of the dust, and made thee prince over my people Israel; and thou hast walked in the way of Jeroboam, and hast made my people Israel to sin, to provoke me to anger with their sins — God reminds Baasha of his elevation from obscurity and rebuke him for perpetuating Jeroboam's schismatic worship. The phrase uses the 'dust' (עפר) metaphor for humble origins, echoing the language of covenant grace. Baasha's sin is corporate: he has made 'my people' sin, bearing responsibility for national apostasy.

1 Kings 16:3

Behold, I will take away the posterity of Baasha, and the posterity of his house; and will make thy house like the house of Jeroboam the son of Nebat — Divine judgment announces the annihilation of Baasha's dynasty, paralleling Jeroboam's fate. The phrase shows God's sovereignty over dynastic succession; no human kingdom can persist in rebellion. The repetition of judgment patterns (Jeroboam, then Baasha) illustrates the Deuteronomistic conviction that covenant violation brings inevitable dynastic collapse.

1 Kings 16:4

Him that dieth of Baasha in the city shall the dogs eat; and him that dieth of his in the fields shall the fowls of the air eat — The curse of unburied exposure applies to Baasha's line, a covenant penalty for violating God's law. The phrase parallels the fate threatened against Ahab (21:24), showing the standard curse for covenant violation in the Deuteronomistic framework. Exposure to animals represents the ultimate shame—denial of proper burial rites.

1 Kings 16:5

Now the rest of the acts of Baasha, and what he did, and his might, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? — The formulaic reference acknowledges fuller historical records while emphasizing that Baasha's brief dynasty (24 years) left no lasting legacy. The phrase occurs throughout Kings, reminding readers that Scripture selects only what serves theological purposes.

1 Kings 16:6

So Baasha slept with his fathers, and was buried in Tirzah: and Elah his son reigned in his stead — Baasha dies and receives burial (unlike the curse promised his successors). The phrase shows the fulfillment begins with his heir Elah, who will face the threatened judgment. Tirzah (תִרְצָה, 'pleasant') was the northern capital, but no pleasantness can shield from divine judgment.

1 Kings 16:7

And also by the hand of the prophet Jehu the son of Hanani came the word of the LORD against Baasha, and against his house, even for all the evil that he did in the sight of the LORD, in provoking him to anger with the work of his hands, and in being like the house of Jeroboam; and because he smote him — The summary shows Baasha's guilt on two counts: cultic apostasy (like Jeroboam) and assassination of Nadab (his predecessor). The phrase 'work of his hands' (מַעֲשֵׂה יָדָיו) emphasizes personal agency in sin. Baasha's attempt to secure his throne through violence guaranteed its instability.

1 Kings 16:8

In the twenty and sixth year of Asa king of Judah began Elah the son of Baasha to reign over Israel in Tirzah, and reigned two years — Elah's reign is synchronized with Asa's southern rule. The phrase marks an extremely brief tenure (two years), foreshadowing rapid dynastic collapse. His brevity contrasts with stable reigns, illustrating the instability of illegitimate rule.

1 Kings 16:10

And Zimri went in and smote him, and killed him, in the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah, and reigned in his stead — Zimri strikes Elah down in the same location where Elah caroused, establishing poetic justice within the narrative. The phrase marks Zimri's violent usurpation, continuing the pattern of northern bloodshed. After only two years, Elah's dynasty collapses.

1 Kings 16:11

And it came to pass, when he began to reign, as soon as he sat on the throne of his kingdom, that he slew all the house of Baasha: he left him not one that pisseth against a wall, among his kindred, nor his friends — Zimri executes a genocidal purge of Baasha's entire household, eliminating all potential rivals. The phrase 'pisseth against a wall' (שֹׁתֵן קִיר) is a crude Hebraic idiom for males. This total annihilation fulfills Jehu's prophecy (16:3-4), showing God's word executing through human agents.

1 Kings 16:12

Thus Zimri destroyed all the house of Baasha, according to the word of the LORD which he spake against Baasha by Hanani the prophet — The narrator explicitly connects Zimri's purge to God's word through Jehu the prophet, showing divine sovereignty even through a usurper's violence. The phrase shows a pattern: God's prophetic word directs history, but human agents carry out the consequences of covenant violation. Zimri is the instrument of judgment.

1 Kings 16:13

For all the sins of Baasha, and the sins of Elah his son, by which they sinned, and by which they made Israel to sin, in provoking the LORD God of Israel to anger with their vanities — The summary attributes the dynasty's destruction to both rulers' cultic apostasy (their 'vanities,' הֶבְלֵיהֶם—empty idolatries). The phrase emphasizes the corporate nature of sin: leaders' apostasy corrupts the nation, bringing collective judgment.

1 Kings 16:14

Now the rest of the acts of Elah, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? — The formulaic closure for Elah's negligible reign emphasizes that his reign lasted only two years and left no significant legacy. The phrase marks the brevity and futility of illegitimate rule.

1 Kings 16:15

In the twenty and seventh year of Asa king of Judah did Zimri reign seven days in Tirzah. And the people were encamped against Gibbethon, which belonged to the Philistines — Zimri's usurpation triggers immediate military crisis: Israel's army is besieging Gibbethon, a Philistine fortress, and refuses to accept his regicide. The phrase shows the people's sovereignty—they reject an illegitimate ruler even in the midst of military operations. The Philistine siege emphasizes external pressure on the north.

1 Kings 16:16

And the people that were encamped heard say, Zimri hath conspired, and hath also slain the king: wherefore all Israel made Omri, the captain of the host, king over the land that day in the camp — The army, hearing of Zimri's coup, immediately proclaims Omri (the commander-in-chief) as counter-king. The phrase shows popular rejection of regicide; the soldiers' loyalty shifts instantly to their military commander. This marks the rise of the House of Omri, destined to dominate northern politics.

1 Kings 16:17

And Omri went up from Gibbethon, and all Israel with him, and they besieged Tirzah — Omri leads the entire army from the Philistine siege to besiege Zimri in Tirzah, establishing immediate control. The phrase shows strategic military acumen: Omri abandons the external siege to eliminate the internal usurper first, a pragmatic prioritization of existential threats.

1 Kings 16:18

And it came to pass, when Zimri saw that the city was taken, that he went into the palace of the king's house, and burnt the house over him with fire, and died — Zimri, seeing Tirzah will fall, commits suicide by immolation in the royal palace. The phrase shows a dark poetic irony: Zimri, who killed Elah at a feast, now dies in flames rather than face capture. His self-immolation marks the end of his seven-day reign.

1 Kings 16:19

For his sins which he sinned in doing evil in the sight of the LORD, in walking in the way of Jeroboam, and in his sin which he did to make Israel to sin — Zimri's brief reign is evaluated through the Deuteronomistic lens: despite his military legitimacy, his rule perpetuates northern apostasy. The phrase shows judgment transcends military victory; a usurper who maintains schismatic worship receives no approval.

1 Kings 16:20

Now the rest of the acts of Zimri, and his treason that he wrought, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? — The formulaic closure emphasizes Zimri's treason (קֶשֶׁר—'conspiracy'). His seven-day reign is relegated to historical footnote, illustrating the Deuteronomistic principle: brief, violent rule lacks legitimacy and leaves no legacy.

1 Kings 16:21

Then were the people of Israel divided into two parts: half of the people followed Omri, and half followed Tibni the son of Ginath, to make him king — After Zimri's death, civil war erupts: the people split between Omri and Tibni, a rival claimant. The phrase shows the north in chaos; kingship is contested, and national unity dissolves. This political fragmentation weakens Israel's ability to resist external threats.

1 Kings 16:22

But the people that followed Omri prevailed against the people that followed Tibni the son of Ginath: so Tibni died, and Omri reigned — Omri's faction defeats Tibni's supporters in civil conflict. The phrase marks Omri's consolidation of power through military victory. Tibni's death removes the rival claim, establishing Omri's undisputed rule—but at the cost of internal bloodshed.

1 Kings 16:23

In the thirty and first year of Asa king of Judah began Omri to reign over Israel, twelve years: six years reigned he in Tirzah — Omri's reign synchronizes with Asa's thirty-first year. The phrase notes his twelve-year rule, making him one of the north's longest-reigning monarchs. His reign marks a turning point: more military stability, though continued religious apostasy.

1 Kings 16:24

And he bought the hill Samaria of Shemer for two talents of silver; and built on the hill, and called the name of the city which he built, after the name of Shemer, Samaria — Omri purchases Mount Samaria and constructs a new capital city. The phrase marks a crucial political shift: Omri abandons Tirzah for a fortified, strategically superior location. Samaria (שׁוֹמְרוֹן, from the Hebrew root meaning 'watch'), becomes the northern kingdom's iconic capital, renamed from the previous owner Shemer.

1 Kings 16:25

But Omri wrought evil in the eyes of the LORD, and did worse than all that were before him — Despite Omri's political and military achievements, the narrator condemns his reign as surpassing predecessors in evil. The phrase shows the Deuteronomistic conviction: external power and dynastic stability cannot compensate for religious apostasy. Omri's building projects and military reputation (he eventually becomes infamous in Assyrian records as 'Bit-Omri') count as nothing in the eyes of the LORD.

1 Kings 16:26

For he walked in all the way of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, and in his sin wherewith he made Israel to sin, to provoke the LORD God of Israel to anger with their vanities — Omri perpetuates and intensifies the schismatic worship established by Jeroboam. The phrase shows the north's trajectory: each generation more deeply entrenches idolatry. Omri's 'vanities' (הֶבְלֵיהֶם—false gods, empty idolatries) provoke the LORD's judgment.

1 Kings 16:27

Now the rest of the acts of Omri which he did, and his might that he shewed, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? — The formulaic reference acknowledges Omri's historical significance, which Assyrian records confirm. Yet Scripture relegates his 'mighty acts' to external records, subordinating military achievement to theological judgment.

1 Kings 16:28

So Omri slept with his fathers, and was buried in Samaria: and Ahab his son reigned in his stead — Omri dies and is buried in Samaria, the capital he founded. His son Ahab succeeds him. The phrase marks the transition to the most infamous northern dynasty: Ahab's reign will bring intensified Baal worship (through his marriage to Jezebel), confrontation with Elijah, and progressive covenant violation.

1 Kings 16:29

And in the thirty and eighth year of Asa king of Judah began Ahab the son of Omri to reign over Israel: and Ahab the son of Omri reigned over Israel in Samaria twenty and two years — Ahab's reign is synchronized with Asa's thirty-eighth year; his twenty-two-year tenure makes him one of the north's longest-reigning kings. The phrase marks the beginning of Israel's most turbulent period: intensified Baal worship, famine, prophetic confrontation, and divine judgment.

1 Kings 16:30

And Ahab the son of Omri did evil in the sight of the LORD above all that were before him — The narrator pronounces the most severe judgment yet: Ahab exceeds all predecessors in apostasy. The phrase signals that Ahab represents a qualitative leap in covenant violation. His reign will be marked by the introduction of systematic Baal worship and the attempt to suppress YHWH worship entirely.

1 Kings 16:31

And it came to pass, as if it had been a light thing for him to walk in the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, that he took to wife Jezebel the daughter of Ethbaal king of the Zidonians, and went and served Baal, and worshipped him — Ahab marries Jezebel (אִיזָבֶל), daughter of the Phoenician king Ethbaal, and adopts Baal worship. The phrase 'as if it had been a light thing' shows escalation: mere perpetuation of Jeroboam's schism becomes insufficient; Ahab embraces foreign goddess worship through marriage covenant. Jezebel introduces systematic Baal cult to Israel.

1 Kings 16:32

And he reared up an altar for Baal in the house of Baal, which he had built in Samaria — Ahab constructs a dedicated Baal temple with altar in Samaria. The phrase shows institutional establishment of Baal worship; it is no longer peripheral but central to Samaria's religious life. The temple's construction marks Baal as the state-sanctioned deity.

1 Kings 16:33

And Ahab made a grove; and Ahab did more to provoke the LORD God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel that were before him — Ahab erects an Asherah pole (אֲשֵׁרָה—a sacred tree symbol of the goddess Asherah, Baal's consort). The phrase summarizes his reign's trajectory: deliberate, systematic provocation of God through foreign cult worship. His actions constitute the nadir of northern apostasy before Elijah's intervention.

1 Kings 16:34

In his days did Hiel the Bethelite build Jericho: he laid the foundation thereof in Abiram his firstborn, and set up the gates thereof in his youngest son Segub, according to the word of the LORD which he spake by Joshua the son of Nun — The final verse records a contemporary event: Hiel rebuilds Jericho, fulfilling Joshua's curse (Joshua 6:26). The phrase shows God's word enduring across centuries: Joshua's curse claims Hiel's sons, establishing that covenant violation brings inevitable judgment. This encapsulates the Deuteronomistic message: God's word stands forever. Ahab's reign, while powerful militarily, operates under the shadow of inexorable divine judgment.