HolyStudy
Bible IndexRead BibleNotesChurchesMissionPrivacyTermsContact
© 2026 HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurchesSign in
HolyStudy
HomeRead BibleBible NotesChurches
Sign in

1 Chronicles 26

1

Concerning the divisions of the porters: Of the Korhites was Meshelemiah the son of Kore, of the sons of Asaph.

1
2

And the sons of Meshelemiah were, Zechariah the firstborn, Jediael the second, Zebadiah the third, Jathniel the fourth,

3

Elam the fifth, Jehohanan the sixth, Elioenai the seventh.

4

Moreover the sons of Obed–edom were, Shemaiah the firstborn, Jehozabad the second, Joah the third, and Sacar the fourth, and Nethaneel the fifth,

5

Ammiel the sixth, Issachar the seventh, Peulthai the eighth: for God blessed him.

6

Also unto Shemaiah his son were sons born, that ruled throughout the house of their father: for they were mighty men of valour.

7

The sons of Shemaiah; Othni, and Rephael, and Obed, Elzabad, whose brethren were strong men, Elihu, and Semachiah.

8

All these of the sons of Obed–edom: they and their sons and their brethren, able men for strength for the service, were threescore and two of Obed–edom.

1
9

And Meshelemiah had sons and brethren, strong men, eighteen.

10

Also Hosah, of the children of Merari, had sons; Simri the chief, (for though he was not the firstborn, yet his father made him the chief;)

11

Hilkiah the second, Tebaliah the third, Zechariah the fourth: all the sons and brethren of Hosah were thirteen.

12

Among these were the divisions of the porters, even among the chief men, having wards one against another, to minister in the house of the Lord.

1
13

And they cast lots, as well the small as the great, according to the house of their fathers, for every gate.

14

And the lot eastward fell to Shelemiah. Then for Zechariah his son, a wise counsellor, they cast lots; and his lot came out northward.

15

To Obed–edom southward; and to his sons the house of Asuppim.

16

To Shuppim and Hosah the lot came forth westward, with the gate Shallecheth, by the causeway of the going up, ward against ward.

17

Eastward were six Levites, northward four a day, southward four a day, and toward Asuppim two and two.

18

At Parbar westward, four at the causeway, and two at Parbar.

19

These are the divisions of the porters among the sons of Kore, and among the sons of Merari.

1
20

And of the Levites, Ahijah was over the treasures of the house of God, and over the treasures of the dedicated things.

21

As concerning the sons of Laadan; the sons of the Gershonite Laadan, chief fathers, even of Laadan the Gershonite, were Jehieli.

22

The sons of Jehieli; Zetham, and Joel his brother, which were over the treasures of the house of the Lord.

1
23

Of the Amramites, and the Izharites, the Hebronites, and the Uzzielites:

24

And Shebuel the son of Gershom, the son of Moses, was ruler of the treasures.

25

And his brethren by Eliezer; Rehabiah his son, and Jeshaiah his son, and Joram his son, and Zichri his son, and Shelomith his son.

26

Which Shelomith and his brethren were over all the treasures of the dedicated things, which David the king, and the chief fathers, the captains over thousands and hundreds, and the captains of the host, had dedicated.

27

Out of the spoils won in battles did they dedicate to maintain the house of the Lord.

28

And all that Samuel the seer, and Saul the son of Kish, and Abner the son of Ner, and Joab the son of Zeruiah, had dedicated; and whosoever had dedicated any thing, it was under the hand of Shelomith, and of his brethren.

29

Of the Izharites, Chenaniah and his sons were for the outward business over Israel, for officers and judges.

30

And of the Hebronites, Hashabiah and his brethren, men of valour, a thousand and seven hundred, were officers among them of Israel on this side Jordan westward in all the business of the Lord, and in the service of the king.

31

Among the Hebronites was Jerijah the chief, even among the Hebronites, according to the generations of his fathers. In the fortieth year of the reign of David they were sought for, and there were found among them mighty men of valour at Jazer of Gilead.

32

And his brethren, men of valour, were two thousand and seven hundred chief fathers, whom king David made rulers over the Reubenites, the Gadites, and the half tribe of Manasseh, for every matter pertaining to God, and affairs of the king.

← Previous ChapterNext Chapter →

1 Chronicles 26

The appointment of gatekeepers, treasurers, and officers from the Levites establishes that temple service encompasses not only priests and singers but all the practical, administrative, and security functions necessary for the sanctuary's operation and the community's governance. The gatekeepers are assigned to guard the four gates of the temple and to oversee who enters and exits (verses 1-19), a responsibility that is both practical (security) and spiritual (maintaining the holiness of the sanctuary). The treasurers and overseers of the temple's valuable goods (verses 20-28) ensure that the offerings and resources given to the temple are properly protected and used. The officers and judges (verses 29-32) appointed from the Levites are responsible for administering justice among the people and enforcing the law, demonstrating that the Levites' role extends into the judicial and administrative realm. The chapter's emphasis on the distribution of these duties among many families (verses 12-19 detail the distribution of gatekeeper duties among the sons of different Levites) ensures that power and responsibility are widely shared. For the post-exilic community, this chapter affirms that temple restoration is not merely about worship but about creating a complete institutional structure that encompasses security, administration, worship, and justice. The chapter demonstrates that all these functions are grounded in the Levitical tribe and that they constitute a comprehensive system for maintaining the covenant community's life. The careful assignment of duties suggests that the post-exilic community has the expertise and resources to maintain proper temple operations.

1 Chronicles 26:1

The gatekeepers were organized from the Korahites, a Levitical family, with Meshelemiah son of Kore appointed as leader. This verse introduces another crucial aspect of temple administration: securing and controlling access to God's dwelling place. The appointment of gatekeepers reflects the sacred nature of the temple and the necessity of maintaining proper boundaries around holy space. The Korahites, descendants of Korah who had rebelled against Moses, now serve faithfully in this important role, demonstrating that God extends grace and opportunities for redemption and service. The structured appointment of leadership shows that temple security was not haphazard but deliberately organized under qualified leadership.

1 Chronicles 26:2

Meshelemiah had sons including Zechariah, Jediael, Zebadiah, and Jathniel, who served as gatekeepers. This verse establishes the family structure through which gatekeeper service was transmitted and organized. The sons of Meshelemiah formed the core leadership team managing temple access and security. The multi-generational approach to staffing suggests that gatekeeper service required specialized knowledge and training best transmitted within families. This family-based organizational structure connected personal identity and family honor to faithful service in Gods house.

1 Chronicles 26:3

Additional sons are named, including Elam, Jehohanan, and Elioenai, each described as capable men fit for the gatekeeper role. This verse emphasizes the importance of appointing qualified individuals to positions of responsibility and trust. Gatekeeper positions were not merely administrative but required personal capability and trustworthiness to protect sacred space. The specification that these were able men underscores that temple service demanded competence alongside piety. This principle teaches that faithful stewardship includes both spiritual commitment and practical competence.

1 Chronicles 26:4

Obed-Edom had sons who served as gatekeepers, with eight listed as capable men worthy of the responsibility. This verse introduces another family of gatekeepers whose prominence suggests they held particularly significant positions. The specification of eight capable sons indicates the extent of Obed-Edom's contribution to temple security operations. The emphasis on their capability suggests that gatekeeper roles required judgment, strength, and trustworthiness. Multiple family units sharing gatekeeper responsibilities prevented any single person from monopolizing control over access to the temple.

1 Chronicles 26:5

The text emphasizes that Obed-Edom's sons were blessed by God with strength and ability to serve in these important roles. This verse demonstrates that competence for temple service flows from Gods blessing, not merely human training or qualification. The divine blessing upon Obed-Edom's family resulted in multiple capable sons ready to serve. This theological perspective teaches that faithful service in Gods house ultimately depends on Gods empowering grace. The blessing upon the family demonstrates Gods investment in and care for those dedicated to His service.

1 Chronicles 26:6

Shemaiah, one of Obed-Edom's sons, had sons of his own who were strong and capable leaders. This verse traces multi-generational blessing and competence, showing how Gods favor extends across generations. Shemaiah's sons continued the family tradition of faithful, capable service. The continuity across three generations demonstrates that Gods blessing produces sustained, reliable service over time. This multi-generational faithfulness creates stability and institutional memory essential for the temple's operations.

1 Chronicles 26:7

The sons of Shemaiah were Othni, Rephael, Obed, and Elzabad, along with their relatives Elihu and Semachiah, all described as capable men. This verse expands the family network of capable gatekeepers, demonstrating that competence and capability characterized multiple family lines. The specification of capabilities emphasizes that temple security required individuals of proven ability and trustworthiness. The extended family network ensured sufficient personnel to maintain continuous security operations. This multi-family approach to staffing distributed responsibility while maintaining high standards for gatekeeper service.

1 Chronicles 26:8

All the descendants of Obed-Edom, including his sons and relatives, numbered 62 capable men worthy of gatekeeper service. This verse demonstrates the substantial organizational structure built around gatekeeper families. The total of 62 capable men from one family line indicates the significant personnel investment in temple security. This large number of qualified gatekeepers ensured that the temple could maintain continuous, reliable security operations throughout the year. The emphasis on capability and worthiness shows that temple security was taken seriously and staffed with qualified individuals.

1 Chronicles 26:9

Meshelemiah had eighteen sons and relatives, all described as capable men for their gatekeeper duties. This verse parallels the accounting of Obed-Edom's family, showing another substantial family contributing significant personnel to temple security. The number eighteen suggests that Meshelemiah's family also contributed substantially to the gatekeeper organization. Multiple large families sharing responsibility prevented any single family from controlling access to the temple entirely. This distributed leadership reflected biblical principles of shared authority and mutual accountability.

1 Chronicles 26:10

Hosah of the Merarite Levites had sons and relatives numbering thirteen, all assigned to gatekeeper service. This verse introduces a third major family of gatekeepers, expanding the personnel roster beyond the Korahites. The Merarite Levites' representation in gatekeeper roles shows that different Levitical families shared in the temple's security responsibilities. The total of thirteen capable men from this family demonstrated that competence for such roles existed across multiple family lines. This multi-family, multi-clan approach ensured that no single group monopolized security responsibilities.

1 Chronicles 26:11

These gatekeeper leaders managed security by dividing duties among themselves, ensuring both day and night protection of the temple. This verse emphasizes the organizational structure necessary for continuous, reliable security operations. The division of duties among leaders ensured that no individual bore the entire responsibility and that night operations received adequate coverage. This careful attention to scheduling and rotation demonstrated commitment to maintaining temple security throughout all hours. The principle of shared responsibility distributed the burden while ensuring competent coverage.

1 Chronicles 26:12

The gatekeeper families were organized into assignments for the various gates of the temple complex, each with distinct responsibilities. This verse shows how the gatekeeper organization connected specific families to specific gates. This organizational structure distributed security responsibility across multiple gates while ensuring clear accountability. Each gate assignment represented a significant responsibility and position of trust. The systematic organization ensured that all entry points to the temple received adequate, consistent oversight.

1 Chronicles 26:13

Lots were cast to assign duties at each gate, ensuring fair distribution of both the responsibilities and the honor of service. This verse demonstrates the use of the lot system to maintain fairness in gatekeeper assignments, just as it had been used for the musicians. The casting of lots ensured that decisions about important security positions were not based on favoritism or personal relationships. This fair allocation method prevented tensions and demonstrated that assignment of responsibility operated under divine oversight. The principle of using lots for important decisions reflected Israel's conviction that Gods providence works through seemingly random processes.

1 Chronicles 26:14

The lot for the east gate fell to Shelemiah, continuing the systematic assignment of gatekeeper responsibilities. This verse initiates the detailed allocation of specific gates to specific gatekeepers. The east gate was a significant entry point requiring capable, trustworthy security personnel. The assignment of the experienced Shelemiah to this prominent position suggests that the most significant gates received the most qualified gatekeepers. This strategic allocation of personnel based on capability ensured that the temple's most critical security points received the strongest leadership.

1 Chronicles 26:15

The lot for the north gate fell to Obed-Edom, assigning him responsibility for another major entry point. This verse demonstrates the trust placed in Obed-Edom, whose family had proven capable across multiple generations. The assignment of such a significant gate to Obed-Edom reflected confidence in his judgment and trustworthiness. This allocation ensured that the north gate, another crucial entry point, would be secured by someone of proven capability. The systematic distribution of major gates to qualified leaders strengthened the temple's overall security.

1 Chronicles 26:16

The lot for the south gate fell to Obed-Edom's son Shuppim and Hosah, creating a shared responsibility at another significant entry point. This verse shows the rotation of responsibility and distribution of honor among multiple capable leaders. The assignment of a major gate to both Shuppim and Hosah created shared accountability and distributed the burden of responsibility. This collaborative approach to security ensured that no individual operated without oversight. The principle of shared responsibility prevented corruption while maintaining effective security.

1 Chronicles 26:17

For the west gate and the Shallecheth gate, responsibility fell to Shuppim and Hosah, continuing the systematic assignment of major and minor entry points. This verse shows that some gatekeepers managed multiple gates, reflecting their capacity and proven capability. The specification of multiple gates assigned to capable leaders ensured that both major and minor entry points received adequate coverage. The systematic approach to assigning all gates demonstrated careful planning and comprehensive security organization. Every entry point to the temple received explicit responsibility assignment and capable oversight.

1 Chronicles 26:18

For the Parbar courtyard area, four gatekeepers were assigned to manage access to this important secondary space. This verse extends gatekeeper responsibility beyond the main gates to include courtyard security. The assignment of personnel to specific courtyard areas shows attention to securing the entire temple complex, not merely the main entry points. This comprehensive approach to security protected not only access to the inner temple but also the surrounding sacred spaces. The careful organization ensured that all areas of the temple complex maintained appropriate security and controlled access.

1 Chronicles 26:19

These were the divisions of the gatekeepers from the families of the Korahites and Merarites, organized into their respective groupings. This verse summarizes the organizational structure of the gatekeeper system developed through the detailed assignments. The two main Levitical families—Korahites and Merarites—together formed the gatekeeper organization. This multi-family structure prevented any single group from monopolizing security authority. The organized division of responsibilities reflected careful administrative planning and theological principle of shared responsibility.

1 Chronicles 26:20

From the Levites, Ahijah was in charge of the temple's treasuries and the dedicated gifts. This verse shifts focus from gatekeeper organization to another crucial administrative responsibility: managing the temple's financial and material resources. The appointment of a specific Levite to oversee treasuries demonstrates that financial stewardship was considered a sacred responsibility. Ahijah's role included managing both regular temple resources and special dedicated offerings. This assignment of financial responsibility to a trusted Levite ensured that temple resources were handled with integrity and godly stewardship.

1 Chronicles 26:21

The descendants of Ladan, a Gershonite Levite, were responsible for managing the temple's treasuries in their assigned position. This verse shows that treasury management responsibility extended across multiple Levitical families. The Gershonites' involvement in financial oversight demonstrates that different Levitical clans shared in managing the temple's material resources. This distributed responsibility prevented any individual from controlling all financial authority. Multiple families sharing financial oversight created checks and balances protecting the temple's resources.

1 Chronicles 26:22

Jehieli and his brothers were heads of the families of Ladan who managed the dedicated gifts and treasuries. This verse establishes clear leadership within the Gershonite families responsible for financial management. The specification of brothers working together demonstrates that family units collaborated in managing temple resources. This family-based organizational structure combined personal accountability with teamwork. The clarity of leadership ensured that financial decisions operated under clear authority and accountability.

1 Chronicles 26:23

From Amram, Izhar, Hebron, and Uzziel's Levitical lines came individuals assigned to manage the temple's treasuries. This verse shows that treasury responsibility was distributed among multiple Levitical families descending from various ancestral lines. The broad representation across different Levitical family lines ensured diverse perspectives on financial management. This distributed authority prevented corruption and ensured that resources were managed with multiple forms of oversight. The involvement of multiple families created institutional safeguards for protecting the temple's wealth.

1 Chronicles 26:24

Shebuel, descended from Gershom son of Moses, served as chief official overseeing all the treasuries and dedicated gifts. This verse establishes a hierarchical structure within the treasury organization, with Shebuel at the top. His descent from Moses gave him extraordinary spiritual authority and represented continuity with Israel's foundational leader. Shebuel's comprehensive oversight of all treasuries ensured coordinated financial management while individual families maintained specific responsibilities. This structure combined centralized direction with distributed implementation.

1 Chronicles 26:25

From Gershon came Shebuel's relations who managed the treasuries, ensuring systematic oversight of financial resources. This verse emphasizes Shebuel's network of relatives working under his supervision. The family-based organization ensured that trust, training, and accountability operated within established relationships. Shebuel's authority over his relations created clear lines of responsibility and accountability. The family structure combined with centralized leadership ensured both personal responsibility and corporate oversight.

1 Chronicles 26:26

From Izhar, Shelomith and his relatives managed all the dedicated gifts offered by King David and military leaders. This verse specifies another crucial responsibility: managing special offerings and dedications rather than regular temple revenues. Shelomith's oversight of these dedicated gifts demonstrates that important donations received careful, trustworthy management. The distinction between regular resources and special gifts created separate management categories. This specialized responsibility ensured that dedications were properly accounted for and used according to the donor's intentions.

1 Chronicles 26:27

From battles and plunder, King David had dedicated substantial resources to the Lord for the temple's construction and maintenance. This verse reveals that significant portions of the temple's wealth derived from military victories. David's dedication of military plunder to Gods house demonstrates that he understood military success as divine blessing meant to support worship. The dedication of conquered wealth to sacred purposes reflected theological conviction that all victory belonged to God. This practice of dedicating plunder to the temple transformed military success into spiritual investment.

1 Chronicles 26:28

All the dedicated gifts offered by Samuel the seer, Saul, Abner, and Joab—and all other dedicators—were safeguarded by Shelomith. This verse demonstrates the continuous stream of dedicated offerings throughout Israel's history. The naming of specific individuals—prophets, kings, and military leaders—shows that people across the entire spectrum of Israelite society invested in the temple. Shelomith's role in protecting these accumulated dedications ensured that each offering retained its integrity and purpose. The accumulation of these gifts represented the people's collective commitment to Gods house.

1 Chronicles 26:29

From the Izharites came Kenaniah and his sons, appointed as civil officers and judges among Israel. This verse transitions from temple financial management to the broader civil administration of Israel. Kenaniah's appointment demonstrates that Levites served not only in ritual and temple roles but also in secular governance. The extension of Levitical authority into civil jurisdiction shows their respected wisdom and trustworthiness. The Levites' involvement in civil judgment reflected their reputation for knowing and maintaining Gods law and principles of justice.

1 Chronicles 26:30

From the Hebronites came Hashabiah and his relatives, appointed as officials over Israel west of the Jordan River. This verse shows the civil authority of Levites extending to regional governance beyond the temple. Hashabiah's responsibility for territory west of the Jordan demonstrates that Levitical administrative gifting addressed both spiritual and civil matters. The geographic specification indicates systematic division of civil responsibility across different regions. The appointment of trustworthy Levites to regional offices ensured that civil administration operated according to Gods principles.

1 Chronicles 26:31

Jeriah was the chief of the Hebronites, with his relatives assigned to oversee the half-tribe of Manasseh's affairs. This verse establishes clear leadership structure within the Hebronite Levitical family assigned to specific regions. Jeriah's position as chief ensured coordinated administration of the territories under his oversight. The assignment of specific tribes or regions to specific officials created clear accountability. The systematic organization of civil responsibility ensured that all areas of the nation received oversight according to Gods principles.

1 Chronicles 26:32

The text summarizes that Levites were distributed throughout Israel as civil administrators and religious leaders, ensuring both spiritual guidance and justice. This concluding verse emphasizes the Levites' comprehensive role in Israel's governance structure. Beyond temple service, Levites shaped the nation's civil administration and legal proceedings. This broad involvement of religious leaders in civil governance reflected conviction that Gods principles applied to all aspects of national life. The Levites' pervasive influence ensured that the nation's administrative structures operated according to covenant principles.