But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. This verse has been weaponized and also condemned. Complementarians point to it as biblical order. Egalitarians point to it as oppression. But look at the structure: Christ has a head, too. God is Christ's head. The order isn't a pyramid with a tyrant on top. It's a chain of mutual submission.
I'm a woman in ministry who's struggled with this text. For years, I rejected it because it was used to limit my calling. But I've been reading it more carefully. What if headship doesn't mean authority in the coercive sense? What if it means something more like direction, like flow? The head of a river doesn't push the water. It directs it. Christ is the head of every man, meaning Christ's will and Christ's nature directs the man. The man is the head of the woman, meaning his role is to help direct, to lead by example, to move toward Christ first.
That's a different reading than either side usually offers. It's not freedom from order, but order in the service of movement toward Christ. And if the man's headship is defined by his submission to Christ, then the man who rules over his wife like a tyrant is not functioning as a biblical head at all. He's rebelled against Christ's headship. This framework still asks women to respect men's role, but it asks men to be worthy of that role through their own submission to Christ.
No comments yet. Be the first.