The simplest place to start reading the Bible is a Gospel, usually John or Mark, followed by Acts and Romans, with the Psalms read alongside for rhythm. Catholic tradition often recommends adding the Letter of James early. Orthodox practice puts the lectionary readings of the church year first, with John given primacy among the four Gospels. Whatever path you choose, two practical decisions matter more than the order itself: pick a translation you can actually read, and aim for ten to fifteen minutes a day, not a marathon.
If you tried before and quit, you are not unusual. Most people who pick up the Bible cold stall somewhere between Exodus 20 and Leviticus 10. The text is not the problem. The plan is. This guide gives you one.
Where Evangelical/Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox traditions recommend different starting points, this guide names each position and cites scholars who frame the path. Pick the tradition that fits your context, or read across them. The Bible is large enough for both kinds of readers.
Most experienced readers across the three traditions tell beginners the same thing: do not start at page one. Start at a Gospel.
John Piper, asked the question directly on a Ask Pastor John episode at Desiring God, recommended Mark first (it is the shortest and most action-driven), then John (for its theology), then Acts (for the story of the early church), then Romans (for doctrine), with the Psalms read alongside through all of it. That is a serviceable map.
The reason is practical. Genesis opens beautifully. The first three chapters are some of the most theologically dense writing in the whole Bible. But by the time you reach the genealogies of Genesis 5, the table of nations in Genesis 10, and the legal codes of Exodus 20 onward, a reader with no context can stall fast.
The Gospels solve that problem. They are narrative. They are about a person. Three of them (Matthew, Mark, Luke) tell roughly the same story from different angles. John tells it differently, more reflectively, and is often read second.
Both work, for different reasons:
Mark is the shortest Gospel: sixteen chapters, about ninety minutes to read in a single sitting. It moves. Mark uses the word "immediately" more than forty times. If you want momentum, start here.
John is more reflective and explicitly theological. It opens with:
He deliberately echoes Genesis 1:1 , and frames Jesus as the eternal Word made flesh. Orthodox tradition gives John a kind of primacy among the four Gospels for this reason.
A typical Evangelical/Protestant recommendation runs Mark → John → Acts → Romans, with Psalms underneath the whole sequence. A typical Catholic recommendation begins with a Gospel (often John or Luke), then James as a practical bridge into how to live, then Acts. Scott Hahn frames it this way in his work on covenant theology. A typical Orthodox recommendation reads whatever the church year is reading this week. The lectionary leads, and John leads the Gospels.
None of these are wrong. Pick the one that fits your temperament, and start.
A plan helps. The reason most people quit is not the content; it is the lack of a structure. "I'll read when I have time" becomes "I forgot."
Here is a thirty-day plan that uses everything covered so far. It assumes ten to fifteen minutes a day, six days a week, with one rest day.
Week 1 — Mark. Read Mark 1-4 (days 1-2), Mark 5-8 (days 3-4), Mark 9-12 (day 5), Mark 13-16 (day 6). Rest on day 7. You have just read a Gospel.
Week 2 — John. Read John 1-3 (day 8), John 4-6 (day 9), John 7-9 (day 10), John 10-12 (day 11), John 13-17 (day 12, the longer farewell discourse), John 18-21 (day 13). Rest day 14.
Week 3 — Acts. Read Acts 1-4 (day 15), Acts 5-9 (day 16), Acts 10-13 (day 17), Acts 14-17 (day 18), Acts 18-21 (day 19), Acts 22-28 (day 20). Rest day 21.
Week 4 — Romans and Psalms. Read Romans 1-4 (day 22), Romans 5-8 (day 23; Romans 8 is foundational), Romans 9-11 (day 24), Romans 12-16 (day 25). Days 26-29: five Psalms; pick any, or read Psalms 1, 23, 51, 103, and 139. Rest day 30.
At the end of thirty days you will have read two Gospels, the story of the early church, the most influential letter in the New Testament, and five Psalms. That is enough to know whether and how you want to continue.
If this pace feels slow, double it. If it feels fast, halve it. The plan is not sacred. Consistency is.
The honest answer is shorter than most beginners think.
Reading the entire Bible at a moderate pace takes about seventy hours. At ten to fifteen minutes a day, six days a week, that is a one-year plan. At twenty to twenty-five minutes a day, it is six months. Most one-year reading plans assume about twelve minutes a day.
Three principles, then a recommendation:
Consistency beats volume. Ten minutes every day will get you further than two hours on a single Sunday.
Reading is not studying. When you are starting, the goal is to absorb the story and the voice. Line-by-line interpretation comes later. That is the work of the next pillar in this series.
Out loud, sometimes. The Bible was written to be heard. Most of its first audiences heard it read aloud in a synagogue or a house church. Reading parts of it out loud, especially the Psalms and the prophets, changes the experience.
Aim for fifteen minutes a day, the same time every day, with a physical Bible or a clean digital reader (not your social feed open in the next tab). If fifteen minutes is too much on a busy day, take five. The streak matters more than the length.
The best Bible translation is the one you will actually read. Everything else comes second: formal equivalence, dynamic equivalence, ecclesial pedigree.
A short orientation:
ESV (English Standard Version): formal, literal-leaning, widely used in Reformed and broader Protestant circles.
NIV (New International Version): the most-read English translation. Mid-formal, readable, sits between literal and dynamic.
NRSV and NRSVue (New Revised Standard Version, updated edition): the academic standard. Used across Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox scholarship.
CSB (Christian Standard Bible): mid-formal, very readable, increasingly common in evangelical contexts.
NLT (New Living Translation): paraphrase-leaning, easy on the ear, friendly to a first-time reader.
RSV-2CE (Revised Standard Version, Second Catholic Edition): a standard Catholic study text in English.
OSB (Orthodox Study Bible): the Orthodox-edited NKJV with Septuagint readings for the Old Testament.
If you are choosing blind, the NIV or the NLT for a first read. Move to the ESV, the NRSV, or your tradition's translation after a few months, once you want more formality.
Most readers who quit the Bible stop somewhere between Genesis 5 and Leviticus 27. The genealogies, the building specifications for the tabernacle, the purity codes. They feel alien. They are alien. They are documents from a culture more than three thousand years removed from ours, written in a vocabulary that assumes things modern readers do not assume.
John Walton, an Old Testament scholar at Wheaton College, has spent much of his career on this gap. In The Lost World of Genesis One (2009), he argues that the opening chapters of Genesis are not trying to answer the questions modern readers bring to them (was it seven literal days? did it really happen in 4004 BC?). They are written in the cosmological vocabulary of the ancient Near East, where "creation" meant functional ordering, assigning roles to existing things, more than material origin out of nothing. On Walton's reading, Genesis 1 describes God giving the sun its job as ruler of the day, not how the sun came to exist physically. The Israelites already knew the sun existed. What Genesis tells them is what it is for. Read with that frame, the seven-day pattern starts to look less like a science textbook and more like a temple inauguration.
You do not need to read Walton before you read Genesis. The point is the gap itself. The strangeness is not your fault, and it is not the text's fault either. It is the distance between the world the text was written into and the world you live in.
Three responses when you hit that wall:
Skip ahead. It is fine to skip Leviticus on a first read. Most experienced readers do. Come back to it later when you have more context.
Read it with a guide. A study Bible's introduction to each book, usually three or four pages at the start, gives you enough context to make the strange parts make sense.
Slow down. Eugene Peterson, the translator of The Message, called this kind of reading "eating the book." His phrase, from Eat This Book (2006), is that scripture is to be chewed rather than skimmed. Three verses read slowly are worth ten chapters read distractedly.
The strangeness is part of the experience. It is not a defect.
Five tools that change the experience for beginners.
A study Bible. The ESV Study Bible (Protestant), the Ignatius Catholic Study Bible (Catholic), and the Orthodox Study Bible (Orthodox) all include introductions to each book, maps, cross-references, and theological notes. A study Bible is the difference between reading a foreign novel with no footnotes and reading one with a translator's introduction.
An app for the readings. YouVersion is the most-used Bible app and includes hundreds of free reading plans. Logos and Olive Tree are stronger for study. Hallow and various Daily Office apps integrate the readings with the liturgical year for Catholic and Orthodox readers who want the church calendar as their guide. You can, of course, use HolyStudy for the Bible Study, sharing your reflections, wether alone or with your community to support your study too.
Audio. The Bible Project's app and Faith Comes by Hearing's Bible.is offer free audio in dozens of translations. Listening on a commute or while walking adds another twenty minutes a day without taking time away from anything else.
A reading partner. One other person reading the same chapter the same week, with a fifteen-minute conversation on Sunday, doubles your retention and significantly raises the odds you finish.
A notebook. Not a study journal. A plain notebook. Write down one sentence per day about something that struck you, confused you, or made you stop. Looking back over thirty entries is its own kind of reading.
A person who already reads. A pastor, a priest, a Sunday school teacher, an older friend who has read the Bible cover to cover. Twenty minutes with someone who has wrestled with a passage you find confusing is worth more than a footnote written by someone who has not. Reading in some kind of company is the historically normal way. Reading alone is the modern habit.
The honest note: none of these are required. Plenty of people have read the Bible profitably with nothing but a single paperback and a habit. Pick one tool to start. Add more only if you want them.
Where they agree: Start with a Gospel. The New Testament is more accessible than the Old Testament for a first read. Consistency matters more than volume. Confusion is normal. The text is meant to be read in some kind of community, whether a congregation, a reading partner, or a tradition, and not entirely alone.
Evangelical / Protestant: Begin with Mark or John, then Acts, then Romans, with Psalms alongside. The order is built around accessibility (Mark) and doctrinal foundation (Romans). N. T. Wright, in Scripture and the Authority of God (2005), frames the whole Bible as a five-act drama (Creation, Fall, Israel, Jesus, Church), with the Gospels at the hinge of acts four and five. Reading is participation in the story, not just information retrieval. On Wright's reading, the first time through is less about mastering content and more about learning the shape of the story so the details have something to attach to.
Catholic: Begin with a Gospel (often John or Luke), then James as a practical bridge into Christian life, then Acts. The lectionary readings of the Mass are an ongoing rhythm. What the Church is reading together this week is a reliable place to be reading on your own. Scott Hahn, in A Father Who Keeps His Promises (1998), frames the whole Bible as a covenant story leading to Christ and the Church, with the Gospels as that covenant's climax. On this reading, the right question is not just "what does this passage mean?" but "where does this passage sit in the covenant story?"
Orthodox: Begin with the lectionary readings of the church year, with the Gospel of John given primacy among the Gospels and read in full during the Paschal season. Personal reading outside the lectionary is not discouraged, but the church year is the primary teacher and the natural rhythm. Kallistos Ware, in The Orthodox Way (1979), frames scripture as inseparable from the liturgical life of the Church: it is read, sung, and prayed, not only studied. The practical effect for a new reader: the question of "what should I read today" is already answered by what the Church is reading today, every day of the year.
In practice, a Protestant reader following the Piper map and an Orthodox reader following the Paschal lectionary read different chapters in different orders, but they both spend most of their first year in the Gospels. The traditions converge on the practical question more than they diverge. The new reader's takeaway: do not let the question of which tradition has the perfect entry point delay starting. The traditions already agree on the most important advice for someone in your position.
Boredom is rarely about the text being bad. It is usually one of three things:
You are reading the wrong section for your current state. If you are bouncing off Leviticus, switch to John or the Psalms. Come back to the harder material when you have more context.
You are reading the wrong translation. A formal translation like the ESV or the NRSV reads beautifully if you are used to literary English, but it can feel like wading through molasses if you are not. Try the NLT or the NIV.
You are reading at the wrong time. Five minutes before bed, when you are exhausted, is not a fair test. Try fifteen minutes first thing in the morning, or on a walk with audio in your headphones.
Confusion is a different problem. The Bible is a library of sixty-six books (or seventy-three in Catholic and Orthodox canons, depending on how the deuterocanonical books are counted), written over more than a thousand years, in three languages, across multiple genres. No first-time reader makes sense of all of it. Eugene Peterson's advice runs the other way: read slowly, expect not to understand much on the first pass, come back to the same texts again and again. That is the historically normal approach. Modern reading habits of "read once, comprehend, move on" are the anomaly, not the rule.
A guide helps. So does time.
Where should a beginner start reading the Bible? With a Gospel. Mark for momentum, John for theology. Then Acts, then Romans, with Psalms read alongside. Catholic readers often add the Letter of James early; Orthodox readers follow the lectionary of the church year, with John given primacy.
How long should I read the Bible each day? Ten to fifteen minutes, six days a week, is enough to finish the entire Bible in about a year. Consistency matters more than the length of any single session.
Do I need a study Bible to understand Scripture? No, but it helps significantly. A study Bible's book introductions and footnotes are the difference between reading a book in translation with no notes and reading one with a translator's commentary running alongside the text.
Which Bible translation is best for beginners? The NIV or the NLT, for most first-time English readers. Move to a more formal translation (ESV, NRSV, or your tradition's standard) once you are comfortable. The fuller comparison is in our translation guide.
Should I read the Bible from start to finish? You can, but most experienced readers across all three traditions do not recommend it for a first read. Start with the New Testament, specifically the Gospels, and circle back to the Old Testament later with more context.
Is it OK to read the Bible out of order? Yes. The Bible is a library, not a single book. The order in your Bible is canonical, not chronological. It is also not the order the books were written in.
What if I don't understand what I'm reading? That is the normal experience. Read with a study Bible, slow down, accept that comprehension comes over years rather than weeks, and notice that even centuries of professional theologians still disagree about the harder passages.
Can I read the Bible on an app? Yes. YouVersion is the most-used and includes free reading plans in dozens of translations. Apps are not less serious than print, and audio especially can change the experience for readers who struggle to sit still with a book.
What's the difference between the Old and New Testaments? The Old Testament (thirty-nine books in Protestant Bibles, forty-six in Catholic, fifty-one in Orthodox) is the Hebrew Scriptures plus, in Catholic and Orthodox canons, the deuterocanonical books. The New Testament (twenty-seven books, identical across all three traditions) is the four Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, twenty-one letters from early Christian leaders, and the book of Revelation.
John 1:1-18 — the prologue; the theological heart of John's Gospel and a natural entry point
Mark 1:1-15 — the opening of the shortest Gospel; the announcement of the kingdom of God
Luke 24:13-35 — the road to Emmaus; the disciples' eyes are opened "in the breaking of the bread"
Acts 2:1-41 — Pentecost; the beginning of the church
Romans 8:1-39 — the doctrinal hinge of Paul's most influential letter
Psalm 1 — the opening psalm; the framing of the entire Psalter
Psalm 23 — the most-quoted passage in the Bible, and one worth reading slowly
Genesis 1:1-2:3 — the creation account; read once at the start of a Bible-reading habit, and again at the end of the first month with more context
Where to Start Reading the Bible: Genesis or the Gospels? — a closer look at the order question
Best Bible Reading Plans for Beginners — a comparison of named plans
How Long Does It Take to Read the Whole Bible? — the numbers, by translation and pace
What to Do When the Bible Feels Boring or Confusing — the retention question
Bible Translations Compared — when you are ready to choose a translation deliberately
John Walton, The Lost World of Genesis One: Ancient Cosmology and the Origins Debate (IVP Academic, 2009)
N. T. Wright, Scripture and the Authority of God: How to Read the Bible Today (HarperOne, 2005; revised 2011)
Eugene Peterson, Eat This Book: A Conversation in the Art of Spiritual Reading (Eerdmans, 2006)
Scott Hahn, A Father Who Keeps His Promises: God's Covenant Love in Scripture (Servant Publications, 1998)
Kallistos Ware, The Orthodox Way (St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1979; revised 1995)
No comments yet. Be the first.