If a man takes a wife and then finds no favor in her because he has found some indecency in her, he may write a certificate of divorce. The law permits it. But Moses is clearly limiting the practice.
This was actually a protective law in its context. Without a certificate of divorce, a woman had no status, no protection, no path to remarriage. With one, she had legal standing. She was freed.
But the tone suggests ambivalence. The law permits divorce, but maybe not enthusiastically. Maybe with a sense of: yes, this is allowed, but it's not what I prefer. That matches what Jesus says later - Moses permitted divorce because of hardness of heart, but it wasn't God's original design.
I've been divorced. It wasn't sinful - my ex-husband was unfaithful - but it was a failure of what we'd intended. Even when divorce is right, it's not what God wanted for that marriage. There's always loss.
What strikes me is the structure here. The law acknowledges human brokenness. People sometimes can't make marriage work. The law doesn't shame that or make it impossible. But it also doesn't celebrate it. It permits it with a kind of grieving awareness that something has gone wrong.
That feels honest to me. Divorce isn't always sin. But it's never ideal. The law holds both truths.
No comments yet. Be the first.