Sign in

The Great Schism An Overview

Start here

In brief

The Great Schism is the division between the Orthodox East and the Roman Catholic West — the deepest wound in Christian history. The famous date is 1054, when legates from Rome and the Patriarch of Constantinople exchanged excommunications; but no single date tells the story. The schism was a long estrangement — of language, culture, politics, and finally doctrine — that hardened over centuries and was sealed in blood in 1204.

A widening distance

For centuries East and West belonged to one Church while inhabiting increasingly different worlds. The West spoke Latin, the East Greek — and after the fifth century, fewer and fewer people could read both. The Western empire collapsed under the migrations while the East continued at Constantinople. Rome's bishop, left standing amid the ruins, grew used to acting alone; the East continued its older pattern of councils and brother-patriarchs. Each half developed its own instincts about authority, worship, and theology, and stopped understanding the other's.

Two issues came to carry the whole weight. The first was the Filioque — a word the West added to the Nicene Creed, confessing that the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. To the East this was doubly impossible: a change to the common Creed made unilaterally, and a change the East held to be wrong. The second was the papacy itself: Rome's ancient primacy of honor was becoming, in Rome's own understanding, a universal jurisdiction over the whole Church — something the East had never known and could not accept.

1054 — and what it was not

In 1054 Cardinal Humbert, leading a papal delegation to Constantinople, laid a bull of excommunication against Patriarch Michael Cerularius on the altar of Hagia Sophia as the clergy prepared for the afternoon service; the Patriarch's synod answered by anathematizing the legates. Dramatic as it was, contemporaries did not experience it as "the" schism — the excommunications were personal, communion between ordinary Christians did not end overnight, and both sides expected the quarrel to pass, as earlier ones had.

What made the breach unhealable came a century and a half later. In 1204 the Fourth Crusade, diverted from its course, sacked Constantinople itself — Christian knights looting the greatest Christian city, desecrating its altars for three days. After 1204, the schism was no longer a dispute between hierarchs; it lived in the memory of ordinary people. Reunion councils at Lyons (1274) and Florence (1438-39) produced signatures but not reunion — the Eastern faithful would not receive them.

Where things stand

In 1965 Patriarch Athenagoras and Pope Paul VI consigned the anathemas of 1054 "to oblivion" — a gesture of real warmth that nevertheless did not restore communion, because the causes of the schism, not its symbols, are what divide. Orthodoxy and Rome remain separated above all by the papal claims and the Filioque, alongside developments each tradition made apart from the other. Orthodox Christians are taught to speak of this division with grief rather than triumph: Christ prayed "that they all may be one," and the schism is a wound in the body, not a victory for anyone.

From the sources

John 17:20-21 (opens in a new tab)
Christ's prayer for the unity of those who believe.
Rendered in-app · KJV default · switchable translation
1 Corinthians 1:10-13 (opens in a new tab)
"Is Christ divided?" — the apostolic horror of schism.
Rendered in-app · KJV default · switchable translation