He also became angry at his three friends because they had not found an answer, yet had declared Job guilty, establishing that Elihu is also angry at the three friends for their inconsistency—they could not refute Job yet declared him guilty. The anger at the friends suggests Elihu's disagreement with their approach and conclusions. The finding of no answer and declaration of guilt suggests the logical inconsistency Elihu perceives in their position. The verse establishes that Elihu views both Job and the friends as inadequate in their theological positions.

COMMUNITY REFLECTIONS

Publish a note on this verse