“And kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.”
With his wife's full knowledge he kept back part of the proceeds for himself, but brought the part and laid it at the apostles' feet - the conspiracy is shared, suggesting a common deception rather than isolated weakness. Luke emphasizes that Sapphira is not a victim but a willing participant ('with full knowledge,' suneidotis, sharing complete awareness), establishing joint guilt. The act of laying money at the apostles' feet mimics the righteous behavior of Barnabas (4:36-37), making the deception a mockery of genuine surrender.
Church Fathers on Acts 5:2
And Joses, who by the Apostles was surnamed Barnabas (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation), a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the Apostles' feet. The writer is now about to relate the affair of Ananias and Sapphira, and in order to show that the man's sin was of the worst description, he first mentions him who performed the virtuous deed; that, there being so great a multitude all doing the…
Nicene & Post-Nicene / Ante-Nicene Fathers translations · public domain
COMMUNITY REFLECTIONS
Publish a reflection on this verse
No reflections on this verse yet. Be the first to write one!